On Sun, 2004-10-10 at 10:13, Andreas Stenglein wrote:
Am 2004.10.10 11:14:11 +0200 schrieb(en) Eric Anholt:
http://pdx.freedesktop.org/~anholt/dri/r200-projtex-6.diff
#4 had broken nontcl quite significantly. I'm thinking I just stomped
some of my changes with another editor window
El Domingo, 10 de Octubre del 2004 12:08 AM, Adam Jackson escribi:
On Saturday 09 October 2004 12:02, Felix Khling wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 09:09:52 -0400
Adam Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 08 October 2004 17:22, David wrote:
Hi. Common and savage snapshots from
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1461
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-10 13:13 ---
This patch
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1461
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Am Sonntag, 10. Oktober 2004 21:56 schrieb Eric Anholt:
On Sun, 2004-10-10 at 10:13, Andreas Stenglein wrote:
Am 2004.10.10 11:14:11 +0200 schrieb(en) Eric Anholt:
http://pdx.freedesktop.org/~anholt/dri/r200-projtex-6.diff
#4 had broken nontcl quite significantly. I'm thinking I just
Am Sonntag, 10. Oktober 2004 11:14 schrieb Eric Anholt:
On Sun, 2004-10-10 at 00:26, Dave Airlie wrote:
projtex with TCL works correctly.
projtex with no TCL is closer.
texgenmix row 2 col 2 and 3 work.
texgenmix row 3 col 1 doesn't work any more (cols 2/3 still don't
work). fixes
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:01:30 +0200
David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
They are forwards compatible but not backwards compatible. 4.4 modules
will work on 6.8, but 6.8 modules won't work on 4.4. So yes, we need to
build an Xorg server snapshot.
- ajax
I don't want to reinstall
I missed that you changed the way texcoords get emitted
(4 components for projective texturing) in your patch.
Forget the experimental patch in the bug-database,
something similar might be necessary only for the
old radeon (R100) somewhen, since this
one seems to not support 4 component
Hi!
Sorry for the double posting. This is a thing that needs to be discussed
in both communities.
The via DRM has started it's journey into the linus kernel, but the 3D
driver / DDX still suffers
from a security flaw:
When the MMIO area is exported read-write it is assumed possible for a
dri
http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/3980
Marcelo Tosatti [interview] released 2.4.28-pre4 with few changes
since -pre3 a month ago [story], it contains a number of driver
updates (pcnet, e1000, gdth, prism54), a network update from David,
few more gcc3.4 warning fixes. He noted that no more new
On Sun, 2004-10-10 at 13:50, Dieter Nützel wrote:
Am Sonntag, 10. Oktober 2004 21:56 schrieb Eric Anholt:
On Sun, 2004-10-10 at 10:13, Andreas Stenglein wrote:
Am 2004.10.10 11:14:11 +0200 schrieb(en) Eric Anholt:
http://pdx.freedesktop.org/~anholt/dri/r200-projtex-6.diff
#4 had
I wish libdrm reported something more than just
error 1 (Operation not permitted)
The problem is what I described, not setting the name, the strcmp fails as
the name it gets back from getversion is drm not the card name.. this
causes the libdrm to fail..
fixing the drmto use the
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 23:49:49 +0100 (IST), Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fixing the drmto use the proper name will work fine..
I just checked in code that should fix the name problem. Give it a try
since I haven't figured out how to reproduce the problem yet.
--
Jon Smirl
[EMAIL
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1519
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-10 15:58 ---
Created an
On Sunday 10 October 2004 17:45, Felix Kühling wrote:
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 22:01:30 +0200 David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
They are forwards compatible but not backwards compatible. 4.4 modules
will work on 6.8, but 6.8 modules won't work on 4.4. So yes, we need
to build an Xorg
after a software suspend/resume cycle, running glxgears emits the following error msgs
and
quits:
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x22
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x23
libGL warning: 3D driver claims to not support visual 0x26
libGL warning: 3D
The should be fixed now in xorg cvs.
Alex
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:15:42 -0400, Robert S. Kerr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been looking into the scaling behavior on the ProsavageDDR
I'm using Alex's patch on the Xorg cvs tree.
Based on a recommendation from Alex, I've been looking in the
17 matches
Mail list logo