> I found why my G5 was crashing when using the linux-2.6 version of the
> DRM + git-drm.patch from 2.6.13-rc6-mm1, but not with the CVS DRM.
> The reason was that dev->agp->cant_use_aperture wasn't getting set,
> and the reason for that was that no longer gets
> included and the #if LINUX_VERSIO
Dave,
I found why my G5 was crashing when using the linux-2.6 version of the
DRM + git-drm.patch from 2.6.13-rc6-mm1, but not with the CVS DRM.
The reason was that dev->agp->cant_use_aperture wasn't getting set,
and the reason for that was that no longer gets
included and the #if LINUX_VERSION_CO
On Monday 22 August 2005 06:23 pm, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > It seems you built DRM from DRI CVS, right?
>
> Yep. Is that not the correct way to do it these days?
:-) It IS the correct way. However DRI CVS is not always stable, at
least for FreeBSD. More stable version
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>
> It seems you built DRM from DRI CVS, right?
Yep. Is that not the correct way to do it these days?
> Can you try the following
> patch and do the test again?
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/fbsd_vs_drm-20050818.diff
>
That patched solved my problems. I now have DRI
On Monday 22 August 2005 03:53 pm, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> >On Monday 22 August 2005 02:49 pm, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> >>Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> And so on, through /dev/dri/card254
>
> Mind you, /dev/dri/card0 exists:
>
> [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ~ ]:
Because I need to get Croquet working.
And because it crashes after 3 seconds on 6.2.1,
and because it doesn't work at all with the CVS sources... the CVS
sources can't even do ppracer (a tuxracer derivative) right,
I decided to ignore the fact that I just invested $40 in a video card
with a suppos
On 8/19/05, Vitja Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have compiled Xorg version 6.8.99.900 (6.9.0 RC 0), I was unable to get it
> working in 2d. xserver start but standard x11 background is corrupted with
> horizontal and vertical black lines, X-cursor is ok. After few seconds
> system hangs wi
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Monday 22 August 2005 02:49 pm, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
And so on, through /dev/dri/card254
Mind you, /dev/dri/card0 exists:
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ~ ]: ls -la /dev/dri
total 1
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 21 18:37 .
dr-xr-xr-
On Monday 22 August 2005 02:49 pm, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> >> And so on, through /dev/dri/card254
> >>
> >> Mind you, /dev/dri/card0 exists:
> >>
> >> [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ~ ]: ls -la /dev/dri
> >> total 1
> >> dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 21 18:37 .
> >> d
On Monday 22 August 2005 01:54 pm, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> >> I would expect a difference, but, it might have changed..
> >
> > FYI, FreeBSD -CURRENT does not use fixed major number any more.
> > It's dynamically assigned when it's created.
>
> Cool ! Is this more devfs style (with kernel spac
WOW!
worked like a charm! thanks!
On Sunday 21 August 2005 16:01, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, john wrote:
> > hi!
> > i'm not too experienced in programming, but here it goes: but i've been
> > able to check out the Mesa cvs and the r300 cvs. i've been trying for
> > quite a
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 13:54 -0400, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> >>
> >> I would expect a difference, but, it might have changed..
> >
> > FYI, FreeBSD -CURRENT does not use fixed major number any more. It's
> > dynamically assigned when it's created.
>
> Cool ! Is this more devfs style (with kerne
Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
And so on, through /dev/dri/card254
Mind you, /dev/dri/card0 exists:
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ~ ]: ls -la /dev/dri
total 1
dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 21 18:37 .
dr-xr-xr-x 5 root wheel 512 Dec 31 1969 ..
crw-rw-rw- 1 root wheel0, 162 Aug 21 1
I would expect a difference, but, it might have changed..
FYI, FreeBSD -CURRENT does not use fixed major number any more. It's
dynamically assigned when it's created.
Cool ! Is this more devfs style (with kernel space code) or udevd style
(with userspace code) ?
best
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 03:53:15PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Dave Dodge wrote:
> | libGL error: dlopen .../r300_dri.so failed (.../r300_dri.so:
> undefined symbol: _glapi_add_dispatch)
>
> Hmm.. you have LD_LIBRARY_PATH pointing to a libGL from CVS, right?
Yes, I pulled Mesa, X.org, and
On Sunday 21 August 2005 07:55 pm, Vladimir Dergachev wrote:
> > And so on, through /dev/dri/card254
> >
> > Mind you, /dev/dri/card0 exists:
> >
> > [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ~ ]: ls -la /dev/dri
> > total 1
> > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 21 18:37 .
> > dr-xr-xr-x 5 root wheel 512
16 matches
Mail list logo
