[Bug 5792] glxinfo & Xorg log direct rendering disagree. No errors

Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5792 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-02 13:08 --- Upgra

[Bug 5413] Radeon DRM appears capable of driving 5B62; X600 Pro

Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5413 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 5413] Radeon DRM appears capable of driving 5B62; X600 Pro

Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5413 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 5413] Radeon DRM appears capable of driving 5B62; X600 Pro

Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5413 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-02 11:27 --- Creat

[Bug 5792] glxinfo & Xorg log direct rendering disagree. No errors

Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5792 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-02 11:25 --- Erm,

[Bug 5413] Radeon DRM appears capable of driving 5B62; X600 Pro

Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5413 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-02 11:12 --- Creat

Re: [PATCH] new radeon memory map fixes

On 1/26/06, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 10:43 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > Xorg driver patch: > > http://gate.crashing.org/~benh/radeon-memmap-7.0-2.diff > > > > DRM patch: > > http://gate.crashing.org/~benh/radeon-memmap-drm-1.diff > > Th

Re: [PATCH] new radeon memory map fixes

On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 07:08 +1030, Kevin Shanahan wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:41:30AM +1030, Kevin Shanahan wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 04:04:50PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 10:06 +1030, Kevin Shanahan wrote: > > > > I also tested on my desktop w

[Bug 5792] glxinfo & Xorg log direct rendering disagree. No errors

Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5792 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-02 08:31 --- Well,

[Bug 5792] glxinfo & Xorg log direct rendering disagree. No errors

Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5792 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-02 07:56 --- Looks

Re: [PATCH] new radeon memory map fixes

On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 09:41:30AM +1030, Kevin Shanahan wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 04:04:50PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-01-29 at 10:06 +1030, Kevin Shanahan wrote: > > > I also tested on my desktop with Radeon 9800 Pro (R350), but no > > > miracle improvements the

[Bug 5792] glxinfo & Xorg log direct rendering disagree. No errors

Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5792 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-02 07:17 --- Creat

[Bug 5792] glxinfo & Xorg log direct rendering disagree. No errors

Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5792 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-02 07:08 --- (In r

[Bug 5792] glxinfo & Xorg log direct rendering disagree. No errors

Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5792 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-02 07:17 --- Done

[Bug 5792] glxinfo & Xorg log direct rendering disagree. No errors

Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5792 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-02 05:33 --- Sorry

[Bug 5792] glxinfo & Xorg log direct rendering disagree. No errors

Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5792 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-02 05:30 --- Creat

[Bug 5792] glxinfo & Xorg log direct rendering disagree. No errors

Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5792 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-02 05:28 --- Creat

[Bug 3982] glxinfo disagrees xorg.log / too old libgl

Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3982 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-02-02 05:31 --- Creat

[Bug 5792] New: glxinfo & Xorg log direct rendering disagree. No errors

Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5792 Summary: glxinfo & Xorg log direct rendering disagree. No errors

Re: texture memory management question

Hi Michael, Coincidentally, much of what you're talking about is in progress already, though with i915 as the initial target. Basically the old style memory manager had some advantages of simplicity (no kernel component, primarily), but you are right that it can be improved on and a rewrite is o