Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7236
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7236
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Rune Petersen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thought I'd share some of my patches.
>
>
> Change vp max instructions:
> The current state op the vp code is capable of executing 255
> instructions not 255*4.
>
> Disable unused routes (speedup):
> When trying to get fragment.position to work I found the routes
Hi,
Thought I'd share some of my patches.
Change vp max instructions:
The current state op the vp code is capable of executing 255
instructions not 255*4.
Disable unused routes (speedup):
When trying to get fragment.position to work I found the routes were
only set for the used routes and d
Brian Paul [2006-06-29 12:12]:
> Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
> > Tilman Sauerbeck [2006-06-11 12:35]:
> >
> >>Tilman Sauerbeck [2006-05-22 19:42]:
> >>
> >>>[...]
> >>>
> >>>I found out that the buffer in question was allocated by
> >>>r300BufferData(). Now, the proper call to radeon_mm_free() would h
Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
> Tilman Sauerbeck [2006-06-11 12:35]:
>
>>Tilman Sauerbeck [2006-05-22 19:42]:
>>
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>I found out that the buffer in question was allocated by
>>>r300BufferData(). Now, the proper call to radeon_mm_free() would have
>>>been made by r300DeleteBuffer(), but that
Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
> Tilman Sauerbeck [2006-06-11 12:35]:
>> Tilman Sauerbeck [2006-05-22 19:42]:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> I found out that the buffer in question was allocated by
>>> r300BufferData(). Now, the proper call to radeon_mm_free() would have
>>> been made by r300DeleteBuffer(), but that f
Tilman Sauerbeck [2006-06-11 12:35]:
> Tilman Sauerbeck [2006-05-22 19:42]:
> > [...]
> >
> > I found out that the buffer in question was allocated by
> > r300BufferData(). Now, the proper call to radeon_mm_free() would have
> > been made by r300DeleteBuffer(), but that function was never called.
>
Brian Paul [2006-06-27 10:55]:
> Ian Romanick wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Tilman Sauerbeck wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Index: r300_context.h
> >>===
> >>RCS file: /cvs/mesa/Mesa/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7363
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7363
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-29 08:31 ---
Creat
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7363
Summary: assertion if used root window and is not double buffered
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7359
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-29 05:30 ---
The c
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:20:09 -0700
"Jacek Poplawski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But Matrox works correctly on current kernel with DRI from 7.0 or CVS.
Indeed...
2.6.17 'make oldconfig'
Option "AGPMode" "2"
(**) MGA(0): Option "AGPMode" "2"
(**) MGA(0): Using AGP 2x mode
-> success
Option
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7359
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7359
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-29 03:49 ---
Same
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to
the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7359
Summary: File r300_render.c function r300Fallback line 486
Produ
17 matches
Mail list logo