Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Rune Petersen
>>> Ok commited.
>> I didn't look too closely at this but I've a couple of comments.
>> - COS looks too complicated & broken. If you'd want to get 2 with a
>> LOG2, you'd need 0.25 as source. But even using RCP instead, t
Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
>On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 21:46 +, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
>
>
>>>Does your kernel config enable agpgart and intel-agp as modules?
>>>
>>>
>>no , is compiled into kernel
>>CONFIG_AGP=y
>>CONFIG_AGP_ALI=y
>>CONFIG_AGP_ATI=y
>>CONFIG_AGP_AMD=y
>>CONFIG_AGP_
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 21:46 +, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> > Does your kernel config enable agpgart and intel-agp as modules?
>
> no , is compiled into kernel
> CONFIG_AGP=y
> CONFIG_AGP_ALI=y
> CONFIG_AGP_ATI=y
> CONFIG_AGP_AMD=y
> CONFIG_AGP_AMD64=y
> CONFIG_AGP_INTEL=y
> CONFIG_AGP_NVIDI
Roland Scheidegger wrote:
>>> Rune Petersen
>>>
>> Ok commited.
>
> I didn't look too closely at this but I've a couple of comments.
> - COS looks too complicated & broken. If you'd want to get 2 with a
> LOG2, you'd need 0.25 as source. But even using RCP instead, that's 5
> instructions before p
>>
>> Rune Petersen
>>
>
> Ok commited.
I didn't look too closely at this but I've a couple of comments.
- COS looks too complicated & broken. If you'd want to get 2 with a
LOG2, you'd need 0.25 as source. But even using RCP instead, that's 5
instructions before performing the sine, for something
