http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9996
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 22:54 PST ---
I recently got iba-2 to work for me thanks to aet's help on #dri-devel, so I'll
attach a dump of tri-kil's indirect buffers from the blob soon, probably later
tonight.
I'd
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9170
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 22:49 PST ---
Does this still happen? You might want to provide a little more information;
what is enabled or disabled with the settings "high" and "low"?
Make sure you test with the lat
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10024
--- Comment #53 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 22:17 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=8896)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=8896&action=view)
R300 with the floor as a mirror
I just tried turning the floor into
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10024
--- Comment #52 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 21:02 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=8894)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=8894&action=view)
R300 fragment.position with correct range modification via MUL
This
Hope this patch is OK.
With it I no more get infinite messages like:
Feb 27 15:48:39 localhost kernel: [drm:r300_do_cp_cmdbuf] R300_CMD_SCRATCH
Feb 27 15:48:39 localhost last message repeated 2 times
Feb 27 15:48:39 localhost kernel: [drm:r300_do_cp_cmdbuf] END
Feb 27 15:48:39 localhost kernel: [
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9252
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 10:46 PST ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Could you explain some of your reasoning for that patch? I'm just wondering if
> I should test this, but I'm not sure why you would disable that
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9252
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #8889 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9252
--- Comment #18 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 10:53 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=8893)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=8893&action=view)
r300_scratch is broken.
Correct one.
--
Configure bugmail: http://
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9252
--- Comment #20 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 11:26 PST ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> So the R300 scratch patch is related to the lockups, or another problem?
>
I think it fixes my lockups with beryl, (up to now of course).
Why
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9252
--- Comment #21 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 11:46 PST ---
I still get lockups with that patch, but if it solves your problem then commit
it of course.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
-
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10024
--- Comment #51 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 11:45 PST ---
My theory is that the TEX instruction needs its parameters in a different
range.
Lets try something different:
remove the last 2 changes, so you only have the "wpos in FP
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9252
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #8875 is|0 |1
obsolete|
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9252
--- Comment #19 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 11:14 PST ---
So the R300 scratch patch is related to the lockups, or another problem?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are recei
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9252
--- Comment #17 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 10:49 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=8889)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=8889&action=view)
r300_scratch is broken.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedeskt
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10024
--- Comment #50 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 09:58 PST ---
Didn't seem to help. Do you want a screenshot? I also tried the "MUL
result.color, fragment.position, {0.005}.x;", but it produces black. I didn't
look at the RGB values,
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10024
--- Comment #49 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 09:46 PST ---
in the same code:
try to replace the first set of SWIZZLE_Z with SWIZZLE_ONE
and replace the second set of SWIZZLE_Z with SWIZZLE_ZERO
This should make it a straight MOV
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10024
--- Comment #48 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 09:04 PST ---
I think that change made it worse; now it's mostly a grey blob, probably from
the floor texture.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=ema
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10024
--- Comment #47 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 08:35 PST ---
a hunch:
in fragprog.c replace:
fpi[i].SrcReg[1].File = PROGRAM_STATE_VAR;
fpi[i].SrcReg[1].Index = window_index;
fpi[i].SrcReg[1].Swizzle = MAKE_S
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10024
--- Comment #46 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 07:39 PST ---
Also, both screenshots have been taken from exactly the same position so that
they can be compared easily.
You can see that the R300 screenshot is very different when com
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10024
--- Comment #45 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 07:37 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=8883)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=8883&action=view)
Blob fragment.position * 0.005
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.f
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10024
--- Comment #44 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 07:36 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=8882)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=8882&action=view)
R300 fragment.position * 0.005
This is a screenshot of rendering wit
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10024
--- Comment #43 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 07:23 PST ---
I'm also starting to think that fragment.position is now correct, but there is
some other bug. I can get somewhat correct rendering with R300 now. It is not
completely cor
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10024
--- Comment #42 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 06:43 PST ---
The transition is too narrow try:
"MUL result.color.x, fragment.position, {0.0005}.x;"
"MUL result.color.y, fragment.position, {0.001}.x;"
Though I must say they look alm
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9252
--- Comment #15 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 03:47 PST ---
Could you explain some of your reasoning for that patch? I'm just wondering if
I should test this, but I'm not sure why you would disable that lock?
--
Configure bugmai
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9252
--- Comment #14 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 02:35 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=8875)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=8875&action=view)
Patch, probably not correct!
I don't think it is correct, but it help
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10109
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 02:14 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=8874)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=8874&action=view)
Proposed patch
Probably this should also be changed for other drivers
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10109
Summary: Invalid reads from intersect_rect in radeon_state.c of
r300 driver.
Product: Mesa
Version: CVS
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7173
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
QAContact||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10097
--- Comment #8 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 01:17 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=8873)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=8873&action=view)
my xorg.conf
my xorg.conf
Is there anything else I should provide th
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10097
--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 01:16 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=8872)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=8872&action=view)
syslog with drm debug on.
I activated the drm debug via sysfs and mou
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10097
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 01:10 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=8871)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=8871&action=view)
Xorg.0.log of the 'cataclysmic' crash.
Everything went fuzzy. The ma
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10097
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS/Version|All |Linux (All)
--- Comment #5 fro
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10090
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-02-27 00:06 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created an attachment (id=8867)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=8867&action=view) [details]
> fix hardware clipping
>
> I ha
33 matches
Mail list logo