http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10303
--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-17 05:32 PST ---
Dave Airlie already committed this. Commit
6a9b0cd0b43ba01b24871ec1fa155e192ddeaa56.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- Y
Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
> Hello,
>
> back when I was actively working on DRI drivers almost three years
> ago, I always felt uneasy about the fact that I didn't have an
> extensive array of tests that I could rely on to test for regressions.
>
> Now I've decided to do something about it. I've take
Hi ,
I need your help , I am trying compile intel video drive and give me
this:
checking for xf86Modes.h... no
symlink mode code
configure: error: Must have X server >= 1.3 source tree for mode setting
code. Please specify --with-xserver-source
+ exit 1
what I need upgrade is just xorg-x11-ser
On Saturday, March 17, 2007, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> Hi ,
> I need your help , I am trying compile intel video drive and give me
> this:
>
> checking for xf86Modes.h... no
> symlink mode code
> configure: error: Must have X server >= 1.3 source tree for mode setting
> code. Please specify --
I notice some failures with the example tests (R300) that seem to just be
slight precision errors; I think you should add a margin for error because
usually the hardware will implement things in a faster, perhaps less precise
way.
This lower precision is still "good enough", though.
On 3/17/07,
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 16:41 +, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> Hi ,
> I need your help , I am trying compile intel video drive and give me
> this:
>
> checking for xf86Modes.h... no
> symlink mode code
> configure: error: Must have X server >= 1.3 source tree for mode setting
> code. Please
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 12:44 -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 16:41 +, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> > Hi ,
> > I need your help , I am trying compile intel video drive and give me
> > this:
> >
> > checking for xf86Modes.h... no
> > symlink mode code
> > configure: error
There were a number of bugs related to the pairing of vector and
scalar operations where swizzles ended up using the wrong source
register, or an instruction was moved forward and ended up overwriting
an aliased register.
The new algorithm for register allocation is slightly conservative and
may
This patch seems to break one of my longer fragment programs. I believe this is
because it's running out of registers, but I haven't looked into it in detail
yet.
I think this patch should be committed, but directly followed by a patch to
reduce the number of registers used.
On 3/18/07, Nicolai
Another thought; the same changed are probably needed for the vertprog code. I
think there are also a lot of bugs there.
On 3/18/07, Oliver McFadden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch seems to break one of my longer fragment programs. I believe this
> is
> because it's running out of registe
I remember reading something about Jerome Glisse leading up an effort too
bring support to r500 based cards, though I don't recall if it was
"officially" happening with in the DRI development process, or just a side
effort for now to be folded in once working. Anyway, I would like find some
way to
11 matches
Mail list logo
