On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 01:23:01PM +0800, Rogelio Serrano wrote:
>
> what about matrox? i have a couple of second hand 16mb g400's. maybe
> mesa3d can run on it standalone after a couple of months of hacking?
>
I have used dri without X on my radeon 7500 card using miniglx.
I was using glut whic
Hi
this is the actualized version
Greetings
Stephan Schmid
diff -u drm4/shared-core/nouveau_fifo.c drm6/shared-core/nouveau_fifo.c
--- drm4/shared-core/nouveau_fifo.c 2007-04-09 21:32:59.0 +0200
+++ drm6/shared-core/nouveau_fifo.c 2007-04-16 16:29:49.0 +0200
@@ -82,9 +8
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10523
--- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-16 07:59 PST ---
What exactly is the error/warning that's printed? Can you set a breakpoint in
the warning function and get a stack trace?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10523
--- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-16 08:55 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=9618)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=9618&action=view)
gdb
Here is a backtrace from getprocaddress. I don't remember which
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10529
--- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-16 14:17 PST ---
I found one mistake in the _mesa_append_fog_code() function. If fog mode ==
GL_LINEAR we need to clamp the fog blend factor when it's computed.
I don't know what fog mod
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10523
--- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-16 16:19 PST ---
OK, I think I've fixed this. The problem was a misunderstanding of how the
driInitExtensions() and driInitSingleExtension() functions are used.
Get the latest from git a
On Wednesday, April 11, 2007, Keith Packard wrote:
> > o what should the initial config be? cloned? multihead? single,
> > primary head with other heads initialized to a blank screen?
>
> The X server has some built-in policy for what the starting mode should
> look like. I think we should
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10658
Summary: 3dsmax-04 and ugnx-01 of SPECViewPerf 9.0 cause
Segmentation fault
Product: DRI
Version: DRI CVS
Platform: x86-64 (AMD64)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NE
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10658
--- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-16 23:29 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=9624)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=9624&action=view)
xorg.conf
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userpre
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10658
--- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-16 23:30 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=9625)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=9625&action=view)
Xorg.0.log
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userpr
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10658
--- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-16 23:30 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=9626)
--> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=9626&action=view)
viewperf.log
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/user
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10523
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
12 matches
Mail list logo