[Bug 10523] glActiveStencilFaceEXT causes noop dispatch on R300

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10523 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 10658] 3dsmax-04 and ugnx-01 of SPECViewPerf 9.0 cause Segmentation fault

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10658 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-16 23:30 PST --- Created an attachment (id=9626) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=9626&action=view) viewperf.log -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/user

[Bug 10658] 3dsmax-04 and ugnx-01 of SPECViewPerf 9.0 cause Segmentation fault

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10658 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-16 23:30 PST --- Created an attachment (id=9625) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=9625&action=view) Xorg.0.log -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userpr

[Bug 10658] 3dsmax-04 and ugnx-01 of SPECViewPerf 9.0 cause Segmentation fault

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10658 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-16 23:29 PST --- Created an attachment (id=9624) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=9624&action=view) xorg.conf -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userpre

[Bug 10658] New: 3dsmax-04 and ugnx-01 of SPECViewPerf 9.0 cause Segmentation fault

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10658 Summary: 3dsmax-04 and ugnx-01 of SPECViewPerf 9.0 cause Segmentation fault Product: DRI Version: DRI CVS Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NE

Re: Latest on modesetting

On Wednesday, April 11, 2007, Keith Packard wrote: > > o what should the initial config be? cloned? multihead? single, > > primary head with other heads initialized to a blank screen? > > The X server has some built-in policy for what the starting mode should > look like. I think we should

[Bug 10523] glActiveStencilFaceEXT causes noop dispatch on R300

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10523 --- Comment #12 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-16 16:19 PST --- OK, I think I've fixed this. The problem was a misunderstanding of how the driInitExtensions() and driInitSingleExtension() functions are used. Get the latest from git a

[Bug 10529] Incorrect lighting/clipping in Neverwinter Nights

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10529 --- Comment #16 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-16 14:17 PST --- I found one mistake in the _mesa_append_fog_code() function. If fog mode == GL_LINEAR we need to clamp the fog blend factor when it's computed. I don't know what fog mod

[Bug 10523] glActiveStencilFaceEXT causes noop dispatch on R300

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10523 --- Comment #11 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-16 08:55 PST --- Created an attachment (id=9618) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=9618&action=view) gdb Here is a backtrace from getprocaddress. I don't remember which

[Bug 10523] glActiveStencilFaceEXT causes noop dispatch on R300

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10523 --- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-04-16 07:59 PST --- What exactly is the error/warning that's printed? Can you set a breakpoint in the warning function and get a stack trace? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop

nouveau: nv4b context switching patch (2)

Hi this is the actualized version Greetings Stephan Schmid diff -u drm4/shared-core/nouveau_fifo.c drm6/shared-core/nouveau_fifo.c --- drm4/shared-core/nouveau_fifo.c 2007-04-09 21:32:59.0 +0200 +++ drm6/shared-core/nouveau_fifo.c 2007-04-16 16:29:49.0 +0200 @@ -82,9 +8

Re: OpenGL without X?

On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 01:23:01PM +0800, Rogelio Serrano wrote: > > what about matrox? i have a couple of second hand 16mb g400's. maybe > mesa3d can run on it standalone after a couple of months of hacking? > I have used dri without X on my radeon 7500 card using miniglx. I was using glut whic