[Bug 12731] New: dri is disabled with i915 driver

2007-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12731 Summary: dri is disabled with i915 driver Product: Mesa Version: CVS Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: highest

fix "undefined symbol: ALIGN" on /usr/lib/dri/i915_dri.so

2007-10-07 Thread Sergio Monteiro Basto
Hi, this patch fix my problem , --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_tex_layout.c +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/intel/intel_tex_layout.c @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ #include "intel_mipmap_tree.h" #include "intel_tex_layout.h" #include "macros.h" +#include "intel_context.h" GLuint intel_compressed_align

Re: Initial 915 superioctl patch.

2007-10-07 Thread Dave Airlie
> > At a high level, I'm wondering if something like this could be made more > generic... It seems like other GPUs will need similar relocation processing > so maybe the DRM should grow some generic reloc processing code? Much of > this stuff seems fairly generic, so maybe it wouldn't be that har

[Bug 11499] Mplayer's vo gl:yuv=2 broken on radeon rv410 (PCIE)

2007-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11499 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 4374] Incorrect painting in crack-attack

2007-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4374 --- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-07 12:04 PST --- i've updated to intel driver 2.1.1 and Mesa 7.0.1 and the error is still there -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are

[Bug 8056] s3tc broken in ut2004

2007-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8056 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #11472|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 12240] Regression, maniadrive very slow (rast fallback?) and wrongly rendered

2007-10-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12240 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment

Re: Revert "intel_agp: fix stolen mem range on G33"

2007-10-07 Thread Daniel Stone
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:41:21PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote: > On 10/06/2007 07:42 AM, Kyle McMartin wrote: > > This reverts commit f443675affe3f16dd428e46f0f7fd3f4d703eeab, which > > breaks horribly if you aren't running an unreleased xf86-video-intel > > driver out of git. > > I guess, this will

Re: Revert "intel_agp: fix stolen mem range on G33"

2007-10-07 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 10/06/2007 09:29 PM, Keith Packard wrote: > On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 08:59 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> We do have a rule about "no regressions", so I think we'll have to do the >> revert, but it would be nice to hear what the consequences for the revert >> is for the affected hardware and

Re: Revert "intel_agp: fix stolen mem range on G33"

2007-10-07 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 10/06/2007 07:42 AM, Kyle McMartin wrote: > This reverts commit f443675affe3f16dd428e46f0f7fd3f4d703eeab, which > breaks horribly if you aren't running an unreleased xf86-video-intel > driver out of git. I guess, this will break my graphics, no? http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/20/447 > Conflicts: