[Bug 13732] [i965 TTM] 32-bit app on 64-bit OS aborts

2007-12-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13732 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[i965] 32-bit app on 64-bit |[i965 TTM] 32-bit app on 64-

Re: Buffer object access mode is per-operation, not per-buffer

2007-12-25 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 14:24 +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote: > The fence type bits are solely intended to indicate different completion > stages, so if the union of access modes defined as (RWX) is the > same for all fence objects of a particular driver, you're right. Fence > flushing of a part

[Bug 13732] [i965] 32-bit app on 64-bit OS aborts with "DRM_I830_EXECBUFFER: -14"

2007-12-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13732 --- Comment #13 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-25 19:34 PST --- and with INTEL_NO_TTM set, glxgears can run smoothly -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail becau

[Bug 13732] [i965] 32-bit app on 64-bit OS aborts with "DRM_I830_EXECBUFFER: -14"

2007-12-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13732 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug 11925] Can't get expected result when applying shadow compare function

2007-12-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11925 --- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-25 19:10 PST --- (In reply to comment #6) > *** Bug 13649 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** > Bug 13649 isn't a duplicate of this bug -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.fre

[Bug 13543] Draw bitmap incorrect if DepthFunc is GL_LESS

2007-12-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13543 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment

[Bug 13649] [i915] depth mapping incorrectly with glRasterPos3f and glBitmap

2007-12-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 13649] [i915] depth mapping incorrectly with glRasterPos3f and glBitmap

2007-12-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug 13818] [i915 i965 TTM] part of applied texture is not rendered

2007-12-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13818 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-25 18:38 PST --- Created an attachment (id=13357) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=13357&action=view) test case a 16x16 texture is applied to a 16x16 rectangle but only

[Bug 13818] New: [i915 i965 TTM] part of applied texture is not rendered

2007-12-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13818 Summary: [i915 i965 TTM] part of applied texture is not rendered Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug 13649] [i915] depth mapping incorrectly with glRasterPos3f and glBitmap

2007-12-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13649 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 11925] Can't get expected result when applying shadow compare function

2007-12-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11925 --- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-25 18:25 PST --- *** Bug 13649 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this ma

[Bug 11925] Can't get expected result when applying shadow compare function

2007-12-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11925 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: Buffer object access mode is per-operation, not per-buffer

2007-12-25 Thread Thomas Hellström
Thomas Hellström wrote: > > 3) The validation code emits an MI_FLUSH, updates the breadcrumb > counter, updates the last_write_flush sequence to the current breadcrumb > number and then emits a new fence object, f_new. > 4) The validation code dereferences the old fence object pointed to by > bu

Re: Buffer object access mode is per-operation, not per-buffer

2007-12-25 Thread Thomas Hellström
Keith Packard wrote: > On Sat, 2007-12-22 at 23:40 +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote: > > >> DRM_I915_FENCE_TYPE_READ | DRM_I915_FENCE_TYPE_WRITE | DRM_FENCE_TYPE_EXE >> > > The union of all access modes is always read|write|exe (read from vbos, > write to back buffer, execute from batch buffer

[Bug 13732] [i965] 32-bit app on 64-bit OS aborts with "DRM_I830_EXECBUFFER: -14"

2007-12-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13732 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 13732] [i965] 32-bit app on 64-bit OS aborts with "DRM_I830_EXECBUFFER: -14"

2007-12-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13732 --- Comment #10 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-12-25 00:58 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) > + struct _drm_i915_batchbuffer batch; > > Don't you mean struct _drm_i915_batchbuffer32? > > -struct drm_i915_execbuffer { > +typedef struct d