[Bug 14364] [G33 TTM] glean abort with intel_bufmgr_ttm.c:626: Error -16 waiting for fence fence buffers.

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14364 Shuang He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

[Bug 14364] [G33 TTM] glean abort with intel_bufmgr_ttm.c:626: Error -16 waiting for fence fence buffers.

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14364 Gordon Jin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug 14364] [G33] glean abort with intel_bufmgr_ttm.c:626: Error -16 waiting for fence fence buffers.

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14364 --- Comment #1 from Shuang He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-03 19:09:55 PST --- Created an attachment (id=14131) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=14131) xorg log -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.c

[Bug 14364] New: [G33] glean abort with intel_bufmgr_ttm.c:626: Error -16 waiting for fence fence buffers.

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14364 Summary: [G33] glean abort with intel_bufmgr_ttm.c:626: Error -16 waiting for fence fence buffers. Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux (All)

[Bug 5901] i915: libGL error: drmMap of framebuffer failed ( Invalid argument)

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5901 --- Comment #12 from Erik Zeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-03 06:33:56 PST --- x11-drivers/xf86-video-i810-2.2.1_pre20080125 from gentoo portage gives the same results. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=emai

Re: Fencing cleanup.

Thomas Hellström wrote: > I've just pushed a variant of a fence cleanup patch [...] > > Please let me know if there are any regressions, as I've only > been able to test it on i915. Latest git drm causes a kernel panic on a VIA KM400A, using a recent 2.6.23 kernel. Git drm of a few weeks ago wit

[Bug 14313] [i915 PBO TTM] read pixels through PBO not working when pixel alignment is 1

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14313 --- Comment #1 from Shuang He <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-02-03 00:17:43 PST --- I missed something. Actually the original code is meant to blit copy vertically in reverse direction. but that code seems not working. and following patch change it