Re: in-kernel DRM tree move around....

2008-05-30 Thread Dave Airlie
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:02 PM, David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 10:46 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: Hi, So I've been growing more annoyed with the current layout of the drm tree in the kernel, a) it lives under char. b) everything in one directory. c) header

[Bug 16157] [i965] glean/glsl1 run abort

2008-05-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16157 Shuang He [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug 15582] Qt4 Demo missing animation

2008-05-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15582 Vinay S Shastry [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Bug 16083] [i915] X dies while running a GL app, needs reboot to start again

2008-05-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16083 --- Comment #1 from Andraž \'ruskie\' Levstik [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 01:23:20 PST --- After a few more tests this seems to happen with any terminal app being open anywhere on the desktop(it happens at random times). But if I don't have

[Bug 15582] Qt4 Demo missing animation

2008-05-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15582 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Buschinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 02:32:39 PST --- Created an attachment (id=16822) -- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=16822) how it looks with qt-4.3.4 qt-4.3.4 mesa-7.0.3

[Bug 15582] Qt4 Demo missing animation

2008-05-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15582 --- Comment #4 from Vinay S Shastry [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 02:39:29 PST --- Hey, I'm using qt 4.4. The animation didn't show up in 4.3.X for me either. May be it's some bug in the way qt looks for some opengl extension before enabling

[Bug 15582] Qt4 Demo missing animation

2008-05-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15582 --- Comment #5 from Vinay S Shastry [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 02:43:18 PST --- Created an attachment (id=16823) -- (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=16823) qtdemo on qt 4.4.0 -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 16151] DRI black screen

2008-05-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16151 --- Comment #1 from Max Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 02:48:23 PST --- (In reply to comment #0) PS: I emerged x11-base/x11-drm-20071019 too, but I actually don't know whether I'm using x11-drm or the built in kernel drm (how can I

[Bug 16158] [i915 mesa_7_0_branch] glean case fragProg1 failed

2008-05-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16158 --- Comment #3 from Roland Scheidegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 05:38:01 PST --- The sin/cos functions in mesa_7_0_branch have a few bugs, not only is the used taylor approximation not quite good enough, but repeating behaviour is wrong

[Bug 16151] DRI black screen

2008-05-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16151 Max Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug 16151] DRI black screen

2008-05-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16151 --- Comment #2 from Max Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 06:09:25 PST --- fixed it all by removing the virtual resolution of 2048x2048 in the screen section of my xorg.conf. sorry for bothering you ;) -- Configure bugmail:

[Bug 15582] Qt4 Demo missing animation

2008-05-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15582 --- Comment #6 from Bernd Buschinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-30 08:24:55 PST --- I tried to emerge(gentoo/portage) Qt-4.4 but realised that the ebuilds arent masked for fun, they are broken as hell :) Well anyway I failed installing qt-4.4

Re: in-kernel DRM tree move around....

2008-05-30 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thursday, May 29, 2008 11:26 pm Dave Airlie wrote: On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 9:02 PM, David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 10:46 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: Hi, So I've been growing more annoyed with the current layout of the drm tree in the kernel, a) it

Re: TTM vs GEM discussion questions

2008-05-30 Thread Matthias Hopf
On May 21, 08 11:35:43 -0700, Ian Romanick wrote: | We haven't touched the texsubimage path, having not found it in a | profile yet. It'll probably be doing map/write/unmap, which (as noted | elsewhere in the thread) is pretty much the worst thing you can do. If | you have a relevant

Re: VRAM vs suspend.

2008-05-30 Thread Matthias Hopf
On May 19, 08 20:52:49 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: Now I would be willing to provide a drm tuneable sorta like memory overcommit that could be used on embedded systems and basically says I've designed my system so I never need suspend/resume and I really udnerstand what I'm doing, so don't

Re: VRAM vs suspend.

2008-05-30 Thread Stefan Dösinger
Am Freitag, 30. Mai 2008 19:57:32 schrieb Matthias Hopf: At least on suspend to RAM many GPUs can probably be programmed to keep VRAM contents alive. In that case you wouldn't have to save that data as well. It's a bit far fetched and probably out of question here, but Direct3D has the concept