Hi,
I posted this summary on my blog but I'll send it here as well. The
feedback that I receive in mailing lists is usually better than in blog :)
Thank you,
Tiago
= Improving input latency =
GSoC summary #1 - July 29
The current implementation of X Window System relies in a signal scheme
Tomas Carnecky wrote:
Wow, there are a lot ifdefs in the code.
Exactly what I was thinking when I saw the patch. ;) But I was too lazy
to think for a solution. Thanks for doing that for me. :)
Here comes the result.
Cheers, Johannes
>From 36daa6eccb466164da7538ad7dd7d540ec0eb6b9 Mon Sep 17 00:
Johannes Engel wrote:
> Thomas Hellström wrote:
>> Johannes,
>>
>> If the patch works, it looks correct to me.
>> However, you need to make sure (using defines) that the code will
>> compile also on kernels that don't have the .fault method.
>>
>> /Thomas
> Hi Thomas,
>
> thanks for reviewing and
Thomas Hellström wrote:
Johannes,
If the patch works, it looks correct to me.
However, you need to make sure (using defines) that the code will
compile also on kernels that don't have the .fault method.
/Thomas
Hi Thomas,
thanks for reviewing and suggesting. :)
I created a new variable DRM_
Johannes,
Johannes Engel wrote:
> Hi, folks,
>
> as Ross mentioned four days ago, nopfn has gone from the kernel tree.
> Therefore we need to adapt drm_vm.c to use fault instead.
> What do you think about the attached patch?
>
> Cheers, Johannes
> -
Hi, folks,
as Ross mentioned four days ago, nopfn has gone from the kernel tree.
Therefore we need to adapt drm_vm.c to use fault instead.
What do you think about the attached patch?
Cheers, Johannes
>From ba506005a6e7f7beaaedad7919eebf44b6e6db5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Johannes Engel <
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Andrew Morton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:32:45 +0200 Thomas Hellstr__m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Dave Airlie wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> drm_lock_take(); and drm_lock
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:32:45 +0200 Thomas Hellstr__m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Airlie wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> drm_lock_take(); and drm_lock_free(); are called from
> >> drm_locked_tasklet_func(); which disables interrupt
