On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:36:56 -0700
Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
Ouch. Could you file a bug report using:
http://intellinuxgraphics.org/how_to_report_bug.html
so I've got the information I need to try to reproduce this?
shure. done.
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20856
--- Comment #2 from David John david...@mail.com 2009-03-31 23:37:34 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Bugs like this have been fixed recently in libdrm, Mesa and the kernel. But
you can also work around the problem by creating a driconf
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12899
--- Comment #4 from Helge Bahmann helge.bahm...@secunet.com 2009-04-01
11:40:40 ---
To my knowledge, the code is unchanged, but maybe I can invest some time into
investigating further tomorrow to produce a patch I am more confident of
--
Am Dienstag, 31. März 2009 22:03:45 schrieb Ian Romanick:
Errthis is a bandaid on a bigger problem. What about 24-bit depth
with 16-bit color? What about when we start to support multisampling?
Etc. If the DDX needs the fbconfig information, why not just give it
the fbconfig? Right?
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20954
--- Comment #2 from Rafael Antonio Porras Samaniego sp...@distrobit.net
2009-04-01 11:36:22 PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
I just moved the vblank_cleanup after lastclose, give that a try and see if it
is resolved.
No, the same kernel
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 22:01 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:08:18 -0700
Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
return ret;
I definitely like the idea of caching the LVDS EDID, but rather than
adding it to the intel_output struct I'd rather see it
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 19:36 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
From 8ad1bd63c097f9f6948439c1ce7c0b17b8caa64a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arjan van de Ven ar...@linux.intel.com
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:31:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] drm: Cache the EDID value for a short time in i915
during the
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:15 +0800, yakui_zhao wrote:
Subject: [DRM/I915]: Sync the mode validation for INTERLACE/DBLSCAN
From: Zhao Yakui yakui.z...@intel.com
Sync the mode validation for INTERLACE/DBLSCAN
This covers:
Check whether the INTERLACE/DBLSCAN is supported by
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:30 +0800, yakui_zhao wrote:
Subject: [DRM/I915]: Sync the default modes for LVDS output device
From: Zhao Yakui yakui.z...@intel.com
Sync the default modes for the LVDS output device
This covers:
Add the default modes for the LVDS output device.
The bit
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:21 +0800, yakui_zhao wrote:
Subject: DRM/I915: Sync the panel fitting property with 2D driver
From: Zhao Yakui yakui.z...@intel.com
Sync the panel fitting property with 2D driver
This covers:
a. create the scaling mode property and attach it to LVDS
On 4/1/09, Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:30 +0800, yakui_zhao wrote:
Subject: [DRM/I915]: Sync the default modes for LVDS output device
From: Zhao Yakui yakui.z...@intel.com
Sync the default modes for the LVDS output device
This covers:
Add
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:27:02 -0700
Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 11:30 +0800, yakui_zhao wrote:
Subject: [DRM/I915]: Sync the default modes for LVDS output device
From: Zhao Yakui yakui.z...@intel.com
Sync the default modes for the LVDS output device
On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 13:27 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
I'm not really sold on the whole idea of the kernel generating these
fake modes for LVDS, given that we can support any size and that the
refresh rate is a lie since we're always using the fixed mode. Any
other opinions on this?
It would
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:38:17 -0700
Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 19:36 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
From 8ad1bd63c097f9f6948439c1ce7c0b17b8caa64a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
2001
From: Arjan van de Ven ar...@linux.intel.com
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:31:39 -0700
14 matches
Mail list logo
