Re: [RFC] [intel-gfx] :The backlight issue when KMS is used

On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 11:45:11AM +0800, yakui_zhao wrote: > On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 00:29 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Right. I'd imagine it as i915 loading and calling is_acpi_backlight(). > > If that returns false, it should register a backlight device and also a > > notifier. If a machine

RE: workaround for bogus EDID data

>-Original Message- >From: Jesse Barnes [mailto:jbar...@virtuousgeek.org] >Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 12:42 AM >To: Guo, Chaohong >Cc: dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: Re: workaround for bogus EDID data > >On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:40:44 +0800 >"Guo, Chaohong" wrote: > >> h

Re: [RFC] [intel-gfx] :The backlight issue when KMS is used

On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 00:29 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 09:24:08AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > I'd rather not have a native kernel backlight property (i.e. a property > > on the LVDS output) exposed at all. I chatted with Matthew about this > > a little, and I think

RE: [Intel-gfx] [Patch 2/2_v2][DRM/I915]: Sync the panel fitting property with 2D driver

sorry, please ignore this email Thanks Ma Ling -Original Message- From: Ma, Ling Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 9:56 PM To: Zhao, Yakui; e...@anholt.net Cc: intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [Patch 2/2_v2][DRM/I915]: Sync the panel f

Re: [PATCH] drm: ignore LVDS on intel graphics systems that lie about having it

On Monday 06 April 2009 12:52:16 Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:11:25 -0400 > Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > There are a number of small form factor desktop systems with Intel > > mobile graphics chips that lie and say they have an LVDS. With kernel > > mode-setting, this becomes a proble

[Bug 21067] Xorg can't enable DRI and can' t load drm anymore with the new kernel 2.6.29

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21067 --- Comment #8 from Alex Deucher 2009-04-06 22:24:58 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Does booting with nopat (on your kernel command line) help? > > > Yes ！It works with "nopat" options of kernel command line!

[Bug 12778] suspend regression from 29rc5 to 29rc6

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12778 --- Comment #12 from yury 2009-04-07 04:57:15 --- i now using kernel with verbose-PM messages and... i can find nothing in syslog. lock appears to be before syncing disks: 1. just black screen -> SysRQ doesn't help here.. 2. black screen and

[Bug 21067] Xorg can't enable DRI and can' t load drm anymore with the new kernel 2.6.29

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21067 --- Comment #7 from TeF 2009-04-06 20:48:52 PST --- (In reply to comment #4) > Does booting with nopat (on your kernel command line) help? > Yes ！It works with "nopat" options of kernel command line! But my system is hanged when X exited! Wh

Re: [PATCH] drm: ignore LVDS on intel graphics systems that lie about having it

On 2009.04.07 00:52:16 +0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:11:25 -0400 > Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > There are a number of small form factor desktop systems with Intel > > mobile graphics chips that lie and say they have an LVDS. With kernel > > mode-setting, this becomes a problem,

[Bug 12778] suspend regression from 29rc5 to 29rc6

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12778 Jesse Barnes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbar...@virtuousgeek.org --- Comment #1

[Bug 21067] Xorg can't enable DRI and can' t load drm anymore with the new kernel 2.6.29

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21067 --- Comment #6 from TeF 2009-04-06 17:10:31 PST --- (In reply to comment #5) > 2.6.29 needs the firmware to exist as a separate file. Are you sure you > installed the firmare package for your distribution ? How Can I confirm the firmware exi

[Bug 13258] rubik xscreensaver is completely grey

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13258 Maciej Cencora changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #11 from Maciej

[Bug 13030] New: i915: possible circular locking dependency detected in i915_gem_execbuffer

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13030 Summary: i915: possible circular locking dependency detected in i915_gem_execbuffer Product: Drivers Version: 2.5 Kernel Version: 2.6.29.1 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux

[Bug 21048] [SiS 630/730] Assertion failed when try to use Direct3D under wine

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21048 --- Comment #5 from Alexey Shildyakov 2009-04-06 12:47:32 PST --- what version of xorg-server (or maybe xf86-video-sis) i can install to resolve version mismatch? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -

Re: [PATCH] drm: ignore LVDS on intel graphics systems that lie about having it

On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:29:53 -0400 Jarod Wilson wrote: > On Monday 06 April 2009 12:52:16 Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:11:25 -0400 > > Jarod Wilson wrote: > > > > > There are a number of small form factor desktop systems with Intel > > > mobile graphics chips that lie and say th

Re: [PATCH] drm: ignore LVDS on intel graphics systems that lie about having it

On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:11:25 -0400 Jarod Wilson wrote: > There are a number of small form factor desktop systems with Intel > mobile graphics chips that lie and say they have an LVDS. With kernel > mode-setting, this becomes a problem, and makes native resolution > boot go haywire -- for example,

Re: [PATCH] i915: indicate framebuffer restore key in SysRq help message

On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 14:55:09 +0200 Ferenc Wagner wrote: > At the same time, bring the action message closer to the usual format. > > Signed-off-by: Ferenc Wagner > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fb.c |4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gp

[PATCH] drm: ignore LVDS on intel graphics systems that lie about having it

There are a number of small form factor desktop systems with Intel mobile graphics chips that lie and say they have an LVDS. With kernel mode-setting, this becomes a problem, and makes native resolution boot go haywire -- for example, my Dell Studio Hybrid, hooked to a 1920x1080 display claims to h

RE: [Intel-gfx] [Patch 2/2_v2][DRM/I915]: Sync the panel fitting property with 2D driver

Any comments ? Thanks Ma Ling -Original Message- From: intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of yakui_zhao Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 12:00 PM To: e...@anholt.net Cc: intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.sourcef

[Bug 21067] Xorg can't enable DRI and can' t load drm anymore with the new kernel 2.6.29

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21067 --- Comment #5 from Xavier Bestel 2009-04-06 06:49:01 PST --- 2.6.29 needs the firmware to exist as a separate file. Are you sure you installed the firmare package for your distribution ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/

[Bug 21067] Xorg can't enable DRI and can' t load drm anymore with the new kernel 2.6.29

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21067 Alex Deucher changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24593|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|

[Bug 21067] Xorg can't enable DRI and can' t load drm anymore with the new kernel 2.6.29

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21067 Alex Deucher changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24592|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|

[Bug 21067] Xorg can't enable DRI and can' t load drm anymore with the new kernel 2.6.29

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21067 --- Comment #4 from Alex Deucher 2009-04-06 06:36:12 PST --- Does booting with nopat (on your kernel command line) help? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

[PATCH] i915: indicate framebuffer restore key in SysRq help message

At the same time, bring the action message closer to the usual format. Signed-off-by: Ferenc Wagner --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fb.c |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fb.c index b7f0ebe..3e0

[Bug 21067] Xorg can't enable DRI and can' t load drm anymore with the new kernel 2.6.29

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21067 TeF changed: What|Removed |Added OS/Version|All |Linux (All) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.

[Bug 21067] Xorg can't enable DRI and can' t load drm anymore with the new kernel 2.6.29

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21067 --- Comment #3 from TeF 2009-04-06 01:01:45 PST --- Created an attachment (id=24594) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=24594) lspci info -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- Yo

[Bug 21067] Xorg can't enable DRI and can' t load drm anymore with the new kernel 2.6.29

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21067 --- Comment #2 from TeF 2009-04-06 01:00:33 PST --- Created an attachment (id=24593) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=24593) kernel config for 2.6.29 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=em

[Bug 21067] Xorg can't enable DRI and can' t load drm anymore with the new kernel 2.6.29

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21067 --- Comment #1 from TeF 2009-04-06 00:59:33 PST --- Created an attachment (id=24592) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=24592) Xorg.log when run on 2.6.29 -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab

[Bug 21067] New: Xorg can't enable DRI and can' t load drm anymore with the new kernel 2.6.29

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21067 Summary: Xorg can't enable DRI and can't load drm anymore with the new kernel 2.6.29 Product: DRI Version: XOrg CVS Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: All Status: NEW

[Bug 21020] [BISECTED] xf86-video-ati fails spectacularly on X startup ( on DEC Alpha)

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21020 Michel Dänzer changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|xorg-driver-...@lists.x.org |dri- |

[Bug 21056] PowerBook G4, PowerMac G5, ATI HW Rendering Fails

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21056 Michel Dänzer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|