On Monday 06 April 2009 12:52:16 Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:11:25 -0400
Jarod Wilson ja...@redhat.com wrote:
There are a number of small form factor desktop systems with Intel
mobile graphics chips that lie and say they have an LVDS. With kernel
mode-setting, this becomes
sorry, please ignore this email
Thanks
Ma Ling
-Original Message-
From: Ma, Ling
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 9:56 PM
To: Zhao, Yakui; e...@anholt.net
Cc: intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [Patch 2/2_v2][DRM/I915]: Sync the panel
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Barnes [mailto:jbar...@virtuousgeek.org]
Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 12:42 AM
To: Guo, Chaohong
Cc: dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: workaround for bogus EDID data
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 15:40:44 +0800
Guo, Chaohong chaohong@intel.com
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 00:29 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 09:24:08AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
I'd rather not have a native kernel backlight property (i.e. a property
on the LVDS output) exposed at all. I chatted with Matthew about this
a little, and I think the
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 11:45:11AM +0800, yakui_zhao wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 00:29 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Right. I'd imagine it as i915 loading and calling is_acpi_backlight().
If that returns false, it should register a backlight device and also a
notifier. If a
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 13:57 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 11:45:11AM +0800, yakui_zhao wrote:
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 00:29 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Right. I'd imagine it as i915 loading and calling is_acpi_backlight().
If that returns false, it should register
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 03:25:23PM +0800, yakui_zhao wrote:
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 13:57 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote:
No, since in UMS mode the X server handles the backlight registers.
If so, there is no change about the backlight flowchart in UMS mode.
And only when the KMS mode is used,
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21067
--- Comment #9 from TeF tefi...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 00:43:20 PST ---
(In reply to comment #8)
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #4)
Does booting with nopat (on your kernel command line) help?
Yes ！It works with nopat
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13258
--- Comment #12 from Chris Rankin ranki...@googlemail.com 2009-04-07
00:55:33 PST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
What card do you have?
I think I have traced the bug, but don't have the proper fix yet.
Great news :-)!!And I still have
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 04:20:34PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
All subsystems can register a set of callbacks for backlight control in
its own way, e.g. ACPI, platform driver, i915.
And the backlight manager only exports one single I/F to users, like:
|
|brightness
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 15:25 +0800, Zhao, Yakui wrote:
But if we do so, it seems that we have to solve the dependency issue
among acpi_video, i915 and platform driver.
For example: I915 driver is loaded firstly and the interface will be
registered. But after the acpi video
CC Thomas, Len and linux-acpi mail list.
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 16:22 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 04:20:34PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
All subsystems can register a set of callbacks for backlight control in
its own way, e.g. ACPI, platform driver, i915.
And the
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13258
--- Comment #13 from Maciej Cencora m.cenc...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 06:18:06
PST ---
I think this bug should be marked as duplicate of
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17685
I posted a fix there.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11384
Maciej Cencora m.cenc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21067
--- Comment #10 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com 2009-04-07 07:33:20 PST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
thanks for your patient. I press the Command dmesg | grep drm in my system
,and it shows me some ERROR infomation like this:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13030
Sérgio M Basto ser...@sergiomb.no-ip.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13030
--- Comment #2 from Sami Liedes slie...@cc.hut.fi 2009-04-07 16:53:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=20861)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20861)
Dmesg output, except the very first seconds that I didn't capture
Here's my
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Kristian Høgsberg k...@bitplanet.net wrote:
2009/4/2 Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net:
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 14:41 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
This was only used by the i915 driver for the swapbuffer vsync tasklet.
That functionality is now gone and nothing uses
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13039
Summary: i915(?): Scheduling while atomic when kdm (display
manager) restarting after logging out
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.29.1
Platform: All
In drm_mode_getconnector we send the connector status back to
userspace. However, we only return the last detected status, rather
than performing status detection again, which can lead to trouble if
the configuration changes after module load and initial probing is
done. Since
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13040
Summary: DRM radeon
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.29.1
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13040
--- Comment #1 from Roger Luethi r...@hellgate.ch 2009-04-07 20:09:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=20865)
-- (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=20865)
X Server log
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13039
--- Comment #1 from Sami Liedes slie...@cc.hut.fi 2009-04-07 18:56:01 ---
Here's a second try. I do get the feeling there's something missing after those
Modules linked in: lines. If you think it would be useful, I might try to
comment out
Hi Thomas,
I think we should not ttm_bo_unreserve the bo in
ttm_bo_move_accel_cleanup i am seeing double unreserve
which likely lead to kernel list corruption and i
think it's due to that one (i am checking through
printk but the log is enormous and my script is not
yet done with parsing it)
I
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13040
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r...@sisk.pl
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12861
--- Comment #26 from Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl 2009-04-07 21:06:56 ---
On Tuesday 07 April 2009, John Emil Karlson wrote:
Yes the bug is still present in 2.6.29.1.
Venkatesh Pallipadi fixed an apparently similar bug there. I could ask
On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:48:22 +0800
Zhang Rui rui.zh...@intel.com wrote:
CC Thomas, Len and linux-acpi mail list.
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 16:22 +0800, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 04:20:34PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
All subsystems can register a set of callbacks for
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13030
Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@anholt.net
---
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13030
--- Comment #4 from Sérgio M Basto ser...@sergiomb.no-ip.org 2009-04-08
01:15:07 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
This has been fixed in master, but hasn't been sent to stable due to known
regressions that will be fixed soon.
the master of
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13039
Sami Liedes slie...@cc.hut.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|All |x86-64
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13030
--- Comment #5 from Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net 2009-04-08 02:34:41 ---
A lock order fix could only occur in the kernel, and master refers to linus.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 13:08 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Kristian Høgsberg k...@bitplanet.net wrote:
2009/4/2 Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net:
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 14:41 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
This was only used by the i915 driver for the swapbuffer
Do you want to pick it up then or do you want Dave to take it?
Since it wasn't in my driver, I was assuming airlied would pick it up.
Yup I'll grab it, I was going to leave it for the next merge window as I
dislike doing anything like this post-merge, and it arrived during this
merge.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13039
--- Comment #2 from Sami Liedes slie...@cc.hut.fi 2009-04-08 03:38:22 ---
I do not know if this is the same bug or a different one, but since the
operating environment and symptoms are pretty much same, by best guess is it's
the same issue.
34 matches
Mail list logo
