This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:46:26 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:42:21AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[NOTES:
* The number of regressions related to DRI is alarming, especially that for
some of the reporters have identified the bad commits.
Probably worth letting dri-devel know about this then ... cc added.
* I have
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either
On Sunday 26 April 2009, Angel wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:46:26 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21289
--- Comment #1 from liuhaien haien@intel.com 2009-04-27 00:04:14 PST ---
with Raul's fix in 2D driver, below glean cases work well now：
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21289
--- Comment #2 from liuhaien haien@intel.com 2009-04-27 02:04:41 PST ---
these cases still fail with the latest driver:
makeCurrent,depthStencil,fbo,polygonOffset,pixelFormats,
pointAtten,coloredTexPerf2, coloredLitPerf2.
--
Configure
hullo,
modetest has the bad habit of ignoring the users mode settings and to
fall back to the last mode from the connector.
this patch should fix that issue.
a!
--
aszlig
Universaldilettant
RedMoonStudios
Fix for determining the right mode and to fail if it don't match
(without falling back to
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12861
Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12861
--- Comment #29 from Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org 2009-04-27
17:39:29 ---
Oh nevermind, looking at the report I see that your AGP init is failing so the
driver is just trying to use stolen memory (which explains the 16M videoram).
I
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20673
--- Comment #3 from Jaro Pitkävirta meizinte...@hotmail.com 2009-04-27
12:10:56 PST ---
I'm also experiencing this bug. It seems that the crashes are very random.
Backtrace:
0: /usr/X11R6/bin/X(xorg_backtrace+0x3b) [0x813518b]
1:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:46:26 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pierre Willenbrock wrote:
Ian Romanick schrieb:
Joel Bosveld wrote:
This fixes rendering when using dri2 (so, that means, radeon-rewrite and
radeon-gem-cs) and a near-master xserver (the front-buffer changes). It
is mostly just copied from the
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13040
--- Comment #3 from Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl 2009-04-27 20:20:15 ---
On Monday 27 April 2009, Roger Luethi wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:46:29 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13040
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|12398 |11808
--
Configure
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:43:44 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Sunday 26 April 2009, Angel wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:46:26 +0200 (CEST)
I've tested with kernel 2.6.29.1. The problem still persists. While
everything works fine with 2.6.28 or lower, starting X (both 1.3
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21445
Summary: radeon-rewrite R200 driver doesn't clip opengl context
if there is overlapping window
Product: Mesa
Version: CVS
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21445
Pauli suok...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS/Version|All |Linux (All)
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:46:51AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:46:26 +0200 (CEST)
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21289
liuhaien haien@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21289
liuhaien haien@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment
25 matches
Mail list logo
