On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 18:53:55 -0700 (PDT), Linus Torvalds
torva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
And some of them do seem to be bisected to likely culprits and/or have
patches that are claimed to have fixed them.
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16163
Subject :
On 2010-06-09 03:53, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Bug-Entry: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16129
Subject : BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [] code:
jbd2/sda2
Submitter: Jan Kreuzer kontrolla...@gmx.de
Date : 2010-06-05 06:15 (4 days old)
On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 2010-06-09 03:53, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16129
Subject: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [] code:
jbd2/sda2
Submitter : Jan Kreuzer kontrolla...@gmx.de
Date
On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 08-06-2010 22:53, Linus Torvalds escreveu:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16037
Subject: NULL Pointer dereference in
__ir_input_register/budget_ci_attach
Submitter : Sean Finney
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16104
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
[ Added lots of cc's to direct specific people to look at the regressions
that may or may not be theirs... ]
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
* Quite a few of the already reported regressions may be related to the bug
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16104
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
Configure
On Wednesday 09 June 2010, Sedat Dilek wrote:
The patch from [1] is still missing.
cpufreq-call-nr_iowait_cpu-with-disabled-preemption.patch from
Dmitry Monakhoc
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
Tested-by Maciej Rutecki maciej.rute...@gmail.com
I have already reported
* Jens Axboe jax...@fusionio.com wrote:
On 2010-06-09 03:53, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16129
Subject: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [] code:
jbd2/sda2
Submitter : Jan Kreuzer kontrolla...@gmx.de
Date
On 2010-06-09 11:32, Ingo Molnar wrote:
This should be fixed by commit 28f4197e which was merged on friday.
The scheduler commit adding local_clock() (for .36) is:
c676329: sched_clock: Add local_clock() API and improve documentation
So once that is upstream the block IO statistics
The patch from [1] is still missing.
cpufreq-call-nr_iowait_cpu-with-disabled-preemption.patch from
Dmitry Monakhoc
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.di...@gmail.com
Tested-by Maciej Rutecki maciej.rute...@gmail.com
I have already reported this issue on LKML [2] and cpufreq ML [3].
- Sedat -
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
That has a reverting the commit fixes it, and a confirmation from Nick
Bowler.
Eric, Carl: should I just revert that commit? Or do you have a fix?
This one is reported to have been fixed already. Closed now.
Heh. That fixed already
12 matches
Mail list logo
