Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16175
Subject : 2.6.35-rc1 system oom, many processes killed but
memory not free
Submitter : andrew hendry
Date: 2010-06-05 0:46 (34 days old)
Message-ID :
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kerne
On Thursday, July 08, 2010 09:34:25 pm Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Unresolved regressions
> > --
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353
> > Subject : 2.6.35 regression
> > Subm
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:34:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16284
> > Subject : Hitting WARN_ON in hw_breakpoint code
> > Submitter : Paul Mackerras
> > Da
Hi Rafael,
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:33 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[...]
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16169
Subject : Complain from preemptive debug
Submitter : Sedat Dilek
Date: 2010-05-31 10:10 (39 days old)
Message-ID :
Referenc
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:34:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16334
> > Subject : reiserfs locking (v2)
> > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky
> > Date
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #25 from Artem S. Tashkinov 2010-07-09
05:26:52 ---
I decided not to add this paragraph to my e-mail, so I'm expressing myself
here:
---
It seems like the only difference from the older patch is 32 vs 16, so could
you please ex
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Unresolved regressions
> --
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16353
> Subject : 2.6.35 regression
> Submitter : Zeev Tarantov
> Date : 2010-07-05 13:04 (4 days
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15181
Matteo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Kernel Version|2.6.35-rc1 |2.6.35-rc4
--- Comment #17 from Matteo 201
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.34,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.34, please let us
know either and we'll add th
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16180
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
Resolution|PATCH_ALRE
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #24 from Jesse Barnes 2010-07-08
15:58:55 ---
I cc'd you on the patch, subject "[PATCH] drm/agp/i915: trim stolen space to
32M". It also got sent to the intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org mailing list.
Archives are available at li
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15078
--- Comment #7 from kowalski marcin 2010-07-08 09:45:13
---
pci-e on my end. gigabyte k8nf9u mainboard (rev 1.x).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: --
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #23 from Artem S. Tashkinov 2010-07-08
09:35:59 ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Just sent out a new version of the stolen space trim patch. Can you reply
> with
> your tested-by so we can get it upstream? If you want it in old
13 matches
Mail list logo
