I have to concur with Mr. Champigny on this one. I've always been taught
that template configuration files should be lowest common denominator, so
that those with a clue can wring out the performance, and those without
clues don't waste the time of those with. Of course, on the other hand, I
can't
In light of this info, never mind what I just wrote.
- Original Message -
From: "Michel Dänzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Champigny, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, 06 April, 2001 10:12
Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] cut-and-paste bug in host.def
> "Champigny
I have a generic Brooktree 878HKF card for anyone serious about getting DRI
and TV working together.
Maybe I should send it to Gareth with that beer I owe him. :)
Rich 'Forge' Mingin
Open Source Advocate
> Hello:
>
> Paul C. Leopardi wrote,
> > These are both assigned to gareth, but gareth does
> On Wednesday 04 April 2001 06:07 pm, Brian Paul wrote:
> > This isn't really unexpected. Benchmarking any application on
> > a time-sharing operating system can reveal some variation in
> > performance. You never know when another process or the kernel
> > itself will need some CPU cycles.
> >
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 11:05:35AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > This may or may not have anything to do with your situation, but I
> > noticed a distinct improvement when I switched from using a serial mouse
> > to using a PS/2 mouse. I got a lot more control and my skill level in
> > q
> > Our policy is the following:
> > We only submit kernel changes which will be compatible with the latest
> > XFree86 release to the kernel. When there is a new XFree86 release,
> > there will be updates. This does not include bugfixes which are
> > backwards compatible, which we tend to send
> Anytime the dri developers are in the Philadelphia area, dinner is on me
> :-)
>
> Adam
Only if I don't get to them first. :)
Gareth - You never answered my last mail... What kind of microbrews do you
like? I've got a box and peanuts and the UPS label ready to print.
