Re: amd64 + r300.sf.net drivers

2005-01-05 Thread Andreas Streichardt
FastWrite and switch BIOS and xorg.conf to AGPMode 4 it works. xorg.log tells me dri is enabled but glxinfo still tells me i don't have direct rendering. I compiled and installed mesa as stated in the README. Is it normal that glxinfo prints "Direct

Re: amd64 + r300.sf.net drivers

2005-01-02 Thread Andreas Streichardt
On Sunday 02 January 2005 14:58, Andreas Streichardt wrote: Hi, > ok...thanks for the hint with udev. the problem was that CONFIG_HOTPLUG > wasn't set and so udev didn't work. > I am getting a black screen now but that's a start ;). I experimented a bit but i won't

Re: amd64 + r300.sf.net drivers

2005-01-02 Thread Andreas Streichardt
On Sunday 02 January 2005 14:28, Andreas Streichardt wrote: > On Sunday 02 January 2005 14:25, Peter Zubaj wrote: > > And have you > > /dev/dri/card0 device file ??? > > > > I use udev and this device file is created automatically. > > > > Peter Zubaj > &g

Re: amd64 + r300.sf.net drivers

2005-01-02 Thread Andreas Streichardt
On Sunday 02 January 2005 14:25, Peter Zubaj wrote: > And have you > /dev/dri/card0 device file ??? > > I use udev and this device file is created automatically. > > Peter Zubaj that's the problem. /dev/dri is empty. and i have no idea why. Regards

Fwd: Re: amd64 + r300.sf.net drivers

2005-01-02 Thread Andreas Streichardt
bah...thought that was a maillinglist post and simply pressed replysorry for breaking threading... -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: amd64 + r300.sf.net drivers Date: Sunday 02 January 2005 14:22 From: Andreas Streichardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Peter Zubaj &

amd64 + r300.sf.net drivers

2005-01-02 Thread Andreas Streichardt
s /dev/dri/card0 drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device) drmOpenDevice: Open failed [...] (II) RADEON(0): [drm] drmOpen failed (EE) RADEON(0): [dri] DRIScreenInit failed. Disabling DRI. syslog: Dec 18 12:17:08 franz-pe