Just to confuse matters further, the following patch does *not* help.
Even with this patch applied, power consumption often goes high when
resuming, and writing 1 to i915_wedged after fully resuming fixes it.
I now officially have no clue what's going on. Maybe there's
something wrong with the
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 23:44:35 -0400
Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu wrote:
I probably need to save/restore some more of the power saving state
across suspend/resume... Can you file a bug
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org
wrote:
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 23:44:35 -0400
Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu wrote:
I probably need to save/restore some more of the power saving state
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:25:21 -0400
Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu
wrote:
I just suspended and resumed and power consumption stayed low
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu wrote:
I just suspended and resumed and power consumption stayed low. I'll
try and get an intel_reg_dumper diff next time I trigger this bug.
intel_reg_dumper blames RENCLK_GATE_D2. Patch coming.
Maybe my BIOS doesn't always
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 12:50:01 -0400
Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu wrote:
[resend b/c the intel-gfx list doesn't allow non-member posting]
Hi-
First, thanks for all the great work on i915's power saving features
[resend b/c the intel-gfx list doesn't allow non-member posting]
Hi-
First, thanks for all the great work on i915's power saving features
-- power consumption on my laptop (Lenovo X200s) is now almost as low
on Linux as on Windows.
After a suspend/resume cycle, though, my power consumption
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Jerome Glissegli...@freedesktop.org wrote:
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 09:12 -0400, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
Andy Lutomirski wrote:
Jerome Glisse wrote:
smem.start is a physical address which kernel can remap to access
video memory of the fb buffer. We now pin the
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Linus
Torvaldstorva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
What *has* changed is that we have a newradeon driver, and it looks like
that new radeon driver is crap, and does this:
info-fix.smem_start = (unsigned long)fbptr;
which is totally screwed up. It
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Dave Airlieairl...@linux.ie wrote:
I tried this tree (specifically, a merge of Linus' fb20871 this tree) on
Fedora 11 with modesetting enabled on an integrated Radeon 2100, and
plymouthd
crashes immediately with a corrupt page table. Photo attached. After
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Andrew Lutomirskil...@mit.edu wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Linus
Torvaldstorva...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
What *has* changed is that we have a newradeon driver, and it looks like
that new radeon driver is crap, and does this:
11 matches
Mail list logo
