Re: [Intel-gfx] [Mesa3d-dev] i965 OpenGL is heavily broken again

2010-03-10 Thread Florian Mickler
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:39:15 +0200 Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 23:55 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote: > > On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:24:24 +0200 > > Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 00:05 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [Mesa3d-dev] i965 OpenGL is heavily broken again

2010-03-07 Thread Florian Mickler
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:11:59 -0800 Jesse Barnes wrote: > It would help to know what the server is doing at this point with the > client. It may be that it put the client to sleep and hasn't woken it > up yet, or there could be something wrong with our getbuffers code in > the new scheme. > > Jes

Re: [Intel-gfx] [Mesa3d-dev] i965 OpenGL is heavily broken again

2010-03-07 Thread Florian Mickler
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:02:51 +0100 Stephan Raue wrote: > looks this like my problems that i have reported some days ago with > Subject "Problem using an Mesa based App with recent > xorg/mesa/xf86-video-intel (loop?)" to Mesa-dev, xorg and intel-gfx list? > > i have still this issue, but i don

Re: [Intel-gfx] [Mesa3d-dev] i965 OpenGL is heavily broken again

2010-03-07 Thread Florian Mickler
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:24:24 +0200 Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 00:05 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 22:35 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote: > > > On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:02:51 +0100 > > > Stephan Raue wrote: > > > > &

Re: [Intel-gfx] [Mesa3d-dev] i965 OpenGL is heavily broken again

2010-03-06 Thread Florian Mickler
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:48:48 +0200 Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:36 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:18:07 +0200 > > Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 12:55 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:42:21 +0200 > > > >

Re: 2.6.30-rc1-git5: Flooding log with: Failed to copy relocations back out

2009-04-16 Thread Florian Mickler
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:31:29 +0200 Bruno Prémont wrote: > Hi, > > Current linus tree is flooding my kernel log with: > [drm:i915_gem_execbuffer] *ERROR* Failed to copy relocations back > out: -107875104 > > The number at end of line takes any number, positive or negative. > > The flooding ra

Re: [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Fix lock order reversal in GEM relocation entry copying. -- makes X hang

2009-03-31 Thread Florian Mickler
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:36:56 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote: > > Ouch. Could you file a bug report using: > > http://intellinuxgraphics.org/how_to_report_bug.html > > so I've got the information I need to try to reproduce this? > shure. done. http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20985 thx

Re: [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Fix lock order reversal in GEM relocation entry copying. -- makes X hang

2009-03-30 Thread Florian Mickler
Hi! On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:45:10 -0700 Eric Anholt wrote: > Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt > Reviewed-by: Keith Packard > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 187 > +++--- 1 files changed, 133 > insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) > I testet Linus' Git tree @ 5d80