On Wed, Jan 23, 2008, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 17:06 +0100, Johan Bilien wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> > > > note that in my case I plan to share FBOs between processes, but not
> > > > between contexts. The
; FBO. Is this case also painful to the driver?
>
> No, from the drivers point of view, there is only one process owning
> the context: the X server. Should work.
Just found out that the intel driver seem to have no support for FBO at
the moment :(
-
ses, but not
between contexts. There is only one context, owned by the X server, and
the clients share this indirect context, in which they each create one
FBO. Is this case also painful to the driver?
--
Johan Bilien
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008, Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Johan Bilien wrote:
> | Is it possible to share an (indirect) GL context accelerated with AIGLX?
> | The idea would be to have several clients render to FBOs and a
> | compositor
Is it possible to share an (indirect) GL context accelerated with AIGLX?
The idea would be to have several clients render to FBOs and a
compositor client rendering the final scene.
Thanks
--
Johan Bilien
<[EMAIL PROTEC
Hi,
is the plan of having DRI2 and Kristian's efforts for redirected direct
rendering for Fedora 9 still actual? At least the device independent
part?
Thanks!
--
Johan Bilien
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
This SF.n
