On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 23:44:30 +1100, Darren Jenkins wrote:
> If a NULL value is possible, the dereference should only occur after the
> NULL test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Darren Jenkins
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_irq.c
> index b79ecc4..2f34
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 22:04:36 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hmm, are you trying to say radeon is better at that?
>
> My experience is quite the opposite to be honest.
>
radeon kms is in staging, doesn't pretend to be stable and force all
users to the experimental paths. So yes, I would s
nouveau_drmif.h includes xf86drm.h.
Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau
---
nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in b/nouveau/libdrm_nouveau.pc.in
index 7ef49e5..6ae6287 100644
--- a/nouveau
Avoids conflicts with kernel headers.
Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau
---
This was suggested by Eric so distros can let the kernel install drm
headers, but provide updated headers from libdrm so we can build new
drivers regardless of the kernel version.
include/drm/Makefile.am |2
intel_bufmgr.h is installed in ${includedir} directly, and the other
headers are taken care of by libdrm.pc's Cflags.
Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau
---
intel/libdrm_intel.pc.in |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/intel/libdrm_intel.pc.in b/
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 13:38:59 -0500, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > nouveau_drmif.h includes xf86drm.h.
>
> If it's a source level dependency it should be a regular Requires: in
> the .pc. Requires.private: is onl
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 14:57:36 +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
>
> Fixed following headers_check warnings:
> CHECK include/drm (14 files)
> include/drm/drm_mode.h:84: found __[us]{8,16,32,64} type without #include
>
> include/drm/i915_drm.h:119: found __[us]{8,16,32,64} type withou
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 19:07:24 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Avoids conflicts with kernel headers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau
> ---
> This was suggested by Eric so distros can let the kernel install drm
> headers, but provide updated headers from libdrm so we can b
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Pauli Nieminen wrote:
> > intel_atomic.h includes very usefull atomic operations for
> > lock free parrallel access of variables. Moving these to
> > core libdrm for code sharing with radeon.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pauli Nieminen
> > ---
> > Makefile.am
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 16:46:46 +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
> When using the binutils gold linker, even if libdrm.so is already linked
> against
> -lrt you still need to link your app against -lrt if your app needs symbols
> from
> it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Török Edwin
> ---
> tests/Makefile.am |
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 10:20:12 -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> Yet another Mesa 7.1 release candidate is at http://www.mesa3d.org/beta/
>
> This includes the latest GLSL fixes/features plus other assorted fixes
> from the past 2-3 weeks.
>
This also includes the drm-gem merge, which means that it
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 00:03:43 +0100, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
> I think it would be useful if one could choose software rendering
> without having to uninstall hardware drivers. Maybe a driconf option or
> an environment variable would be the way to go. This could be useful for
> trying new
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 20:14 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Where can I get this intel_reg_dumper from? Is there a tree to check
> out, or a ready made binary from x86_64 (Debian/unstable)?
>
you can install the xserver-xorg-video-intel-dbg package, or build the
reg dumper from the xf86-video-int
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 20:58:28 +, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> >
> > Is available at
> > http://git.infradead.org/users/jaswinder/firm-jsr-2.6.git?a=commit;h=3a911a216742e4ab998f3281409d46a62f252716
> >
> >
> > Please let me know, should I need to resend this patch for :
> > 1. git kernel.org:
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 02:18:50 +0300, Pauli Nieminen wrote:
> ---
> libdrm/xf86drm.h |1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libdrm/xf86drm.h b/libdrm/xf86drm.h
> index c1d173c..a7f9763 100644
> --- a/libdrm/xf86drm.h
> +++ b/libdrm/xf86drm.h
> @@ -37,6 +3
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 09:46:40 -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> Here's an alterate patch the puts _XOPEN_SOURCE and _GNU_SOURCE in config.h
> via configure.ac. Comments?
>
maybe use AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS instead?
Cheers,
Julien
-
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:04:44 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:50:38 -0700
> Keith Packard wrote:
>
> > KMS mode does not call I830AccelMethodInit as that does a ton of
> > random device initialization, but that means that the NoAccel and DRI
> > options were ignored. Split
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 09:36:21 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> I wonder if fbdev could fill the "get something on the screen when the
> driver is busted" hole. Is it good enough to rely on for that?
>
IIRC that won't currently work well, because
probe_devices_from_device_sections will claim the p
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 19:17:01 +0300, Pauli Nieminen wrote:
> >From b7e77b71d1f2d8ff6741e534911e09f10e3f3d4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Pauli Nieminen
> Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:39:57 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH 01/15] libdrm: Add function attribute for debug
> functions to let gcc check par
---
Makefile.am |4 ++--
configure.ac|4 ++--
libdrm/intel/Makefile.am|2 ++
libdrm/intel/libdrm_intel.pc.in | 10 ++
libdrm_intel.pc.in | 10 --
5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
create
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 22:23:46 +0100, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> I think Joe user will install the kernel-header package of its
> distribution, and libdrm should detect at configure time kernel
> header version and people should take care to only enable new
> libdrm stuff when libdrm find the proper
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 18:54:40 +0100, Stephane Marchesin wrote:
> Yes, but the positive side is that distros using a standard/old (about
> a year) kernel don't need to crawl the old libdrm repo and find the
> right version (in your case they have to do this ° backport stuff) ...
> I think that p
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 17:36:19 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index e655916..ee84ffe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -481,16 +481,17 @@ static struct drm_display_mode drm_dmt_mo
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:26:59 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> Why keeping different name for C++ and C ?
>
Because changing the name for C means breaking API for existing users,
which is not a nice thing to do.
Cheers,
Julien
---
24 matches
Mail list logo
