Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> írta:
> On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 22:53, Korosi Akos wrote:
> >
> > Finally!!! It works
> >
> > Thanks to everyone who helped with this work!
> > Expecially to Felix!
> >
> > I have just one more question:
Hi all
Finally!!! It works
Thanks to everyone who helped with this work!
Expecially to Felix!
I have just one more question:
do I need to update ati_drv.o when I update the dri driver?
And if yes, how?
Thanks one more time!
If you need anything to debug, write to me.
I put the XFree86
t still gzipped
> > or something? What does file say about it?
>
> Yeah, I stripped it. Otherwise it's 1/2 MB even with gzip
-9. So I'll
> send the full gzipped version to Korosi Akos privately. I
hope that'll work.
Thanks!
I got it!
But I can not test it before t
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 10:33, Korosi Akos wrote:
> >
> > Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > If memory serves, I believe radeon_probe.c gets compiled
> > into ati_drv.o
> > > so y
Hi!
Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If memory serves, I believe radeon_probe.c gets compiled
into ati_drv.o
> so you'll need a new ati_drv.o as well.
>
> Alex
And where do I need to get a new ati_drv.o from?
>From DRI (somehow) or from a newer XFree86?
And which version would be goo
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2003-08-26 at 10:12, Korosi Akos wrote:
> >
> > Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ărta:
> >
> > The latest working snapshot is r200-20030819.
> > The XFree86 log of the latest working snapsho
Hi all!
So now I provide more information about the problem.
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> írta:
> Indeed, but the X config and log files might also be
useful, as well as
> the last snapshot that worked.
I provide uname -a for any case:
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.4.22-pre5 #1 Wed Jul 30
2
Hi Felix and Michael!
Thanks for your responses!
Felix Kühling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not right now. A backtrace from the Xserver would be
really nice if you
> could get one.
What do you mean by this?
Something like "X -probeonly", or what exactly?
> I almost forgot, the log below looks
