Here are the wireless ones:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Unresolved regressions
> --
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13898
> Subject : Intel 3945ABG - problems on 2.6.30.X
> Submitter : dienet
> Dat
>
> If anyone complains of getting the following errors at startx:
>
> mtrr: 0xf800,0x200 overlaps existing 0xf800,0x100
> mtrr: 0xf800,0x200 overlaps existing 0xf800,0x100
> [drm:radeon_cp_init] *ERROR* radeon_cp_init called without lock held
> [drm:radeon_unlock]
I've built DRI CVS along with Mesa CVS to get test my IGP340M on the 2.6.1
kernel. I'd like to report success. Note: this chipset has no TCL.
glinfo (I cut GL_EXTENSIONS from here):
disabling TCL support
GL_VERSION: 1.2 Mesa 6.1
GL_RENDERER: Mesa DRI Radeon 20030328 AGP 4x x86/MMX/SSE2 NO-TCL
GL_
How should this affect DRI 3d drivers? According to the documenation:
http://dri.sourceforge.net/doc/DRIintro.html
it says "Most DRI 3D drivers today are based on Mesa". How so?
Is it that the 3d drivers (_dri.so's) use the Mesa Library to to
catch OpenGL calls and map them onto hardware events?
This sounds like a great idea indeed. There are many questions, I'm sure.
One that comes to mind is:
*Who* would be able to vote?
Luis
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Alex Deucher wrote:
> This proposal comes up periodically on this and other xfree lists, but
> never really goes anywhere. Why no
> --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-06 18:33 ---
> Hi Christopher,
>
> The problem isn't that 3D isn't supported by DRI, but rather that the Linux
> kernel does not yet support agpgart on Radeon IGP chipsets, and without working
> agpgart, you have no DRI. Theoretica
