Dave, you mentioned that you were going to pull in the TTM Kconfig fix
that I submitted (the one that allows TTM to be built into the kernel
instead of just a module). What are you going to do about the hardlock
that occurs when drm/radeon/fbcon are all built into the kernel. It
seems like fbcon do
I have found 2 issues while using these patches. The first issue I already
brought up with Glisse, the TTM module can not be built into the kernel. The
first patch fixes this issue. The second issue is that when radeon drm
module is built into the kernel, fbcon does not get loaded before radeon so
commit 85adafcf5d18e58c60d9fdbb718abe9149661736
Author: Ryan Hope
Date: Fri Jun 12 12:17:54 2009 -0400
fix ttm kconfig
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/Makefile
index 0686829..299a73c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm
commit f2475176fbf8590a5d9c029ec08fa05c5bde5860
Author: Ryan Hope
Date: Fri Jun 12 12:17:54 2009 -0400
fix ttm kconfig
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/Makefile
index 0686829..299a73c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm
commit 093f1cb1a1850951f86244ada018672885ec4ace
Author: Ryan Hope
Date: Sun Jun 14 09:36:48 2009 -0400
fix fbcon/radeon initialization order
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
index f70c351..ff4e052 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon
commit 093f1cb1a1850951f86244ada018672885ec4ace
Author: Ryan Hope
Date: Sun Jun 14 09:36:48 2009 -0400
fix fbcon/radeon initialization order
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c
index f70c351..ff4e052 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon
Moving libdrm out of drm.git seems like a good idea to me. Sure they
are different sides of the same coin but drm and libdrm should have
their own physical git repos. It makes things a little cleaner in my
eyes. It also makes things easier for git noobs.
-Ryan
On 2/28/09, vehemens wrote:
> On Sa
I doubled checked today, drm from -rc5-mm3 does not support r500. I am
using xorg-server 1.4.2, libdrm from git, mesa from git, and radeonhd
from git. When I run glxgears i get this:
$ glxgears
R500 support requires a newer drm.
-Ryan
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:41 AM, Ryan Hope <[EM
I will test again, but when I tried using the in-kernel drm i got a
message from glxgears saying I needed a newer version...
-Ryan
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Dave Airlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Is anyone working on cleaning up the drm code so that it works with
>> the latest -mm sou
that is for vanilla kernel i am pretty sure, I am asking about the -mm
patchset, i tried building the latest drm from git againsts -mm and it
does not build
-Ryan
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Alex Deucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 3:59 PM, Ryan Hop
Is anyone working on cleaning up the drm code so that it works with
the latest -mm sources. I sure would like to use r500 drm with an -mm
kernel.
-Ryan
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to bu
I ran create_lk_drm.sh today so that I could create a patch for
2.6.26-rc4, however the compile failed the following patch fixes
the issue:
diff --git a/drivers/char/drm/Makefile b/drivers/char/drm/Makefile
index 7a477a1..866f742 100644
--- a/drivers/char/drm/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/char/drm/Ma
12 matches
Mail list logo