On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 12:06:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
> Subject : i915 VT switch with AIGLX causes X lock up
> Submitter : Sitsofe Wheeler
> Date : 2009-02-21 15:38 (107 da
ween 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
> Subject : i915 VT switch with AIGLX causes X lock up
> Submitter : Sitsofe Wheeler
>
ween 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
> Subject : i915 VT switch with AIGLX causes X lock up
> Submitter : Sitsofe Wheeler
>
g-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
> Subject : i915 VT switch with AIGLX causes X lock up
> Submitter : Sitsofe Wheeler
> Date : 2009-02-21 15:38 (85 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:46:51AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:46:26 +0200 (CEST)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
> >
> > The following bug entr
(CC'ing dri-devel, Eric Anholt and Jesse Barnes)
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:34:01PM +0200, Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am not sure if this is just a user error/ too old userspace problem,
[User stated that 2.6.3 intel driver is being used in another email]
> but I recognized that
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 02:02:56PM +0100, Frank Seidel wrote:
> Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> > Hmm. Does switching to and then back from a virtual terminal also break?
>
> I think i have the same problem and yes, switching to and back from vt
> also breaks X.
> I ope
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 07:02:17PM +0100, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 08:20:56PM +0100, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > > I tested several snapshots post 2.6.28 and all of them show one severe
> > > problem: resume from disk is
The problem is still here in 2.6.29-rc7. I got around to bisecting this
and here's the commit that was fingered:
commit 14d200c5e5bd19219d930bbb9a5a22758c8f5bec
Author: Jesse Barnes
Date: Fri Feb 6 13:04:49 2009 -0800
drm/i915: capture last_vblank count at IRQ uninstall time too
I
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 08:20:56PM +0100, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
>
> I tested several snapshots post 2.6.28 and all of them show one severe
> problem: resume from disk is not always successful. Only about 50% of the
> resume attempts work, in the other cases I just get a completely black
> scree
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:05:58AM -0800, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 05:48 -0800, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 12:39:48PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks, i've reverted the commit for now. Could you plea
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 12:39:48PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> Thanks, i've reverted the commit for now. Could you please send
> a 'dmesg' from the bootup with the failed driver? By all
> likelyhood an ioremap failure causes a driver failure.
>
See below (drm says it initalized though...):
Hi,
With the latest -tip /dev/dri/card0 is MIA on my EeePC 900. A bisection
has tracked the probem down to the following commit:
commit 17581ad812a9abb0182260374ef2e52d4a808a64
Author: Venkatesh Pallipadi
Date: Tue Feb 24 17:35:14 2009 -0800
gpu/drm, x86, PAT: PAT support for io_mapping_*
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 02:49:06PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 27.2.2009 14:04, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 02:32:31AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:28:51 +0100 Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >>
> >>>everytime I run
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 02:32:31AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:28:51 +0100 Jiri Slaby wrote:
>
> > everytime I run X, it gets stuck. Currently running on mmotm
> > 2009-02-26-16-58, but I think this is wider problem. I had i915 disabled
> > for a long time (until I noti
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 08:44:09AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Can you get a backtrace of the hung process, maybe by logging in from another
> machine and using gdb on the Xorg process?
(Done via sleep 30s; gdb.sh where gdb.sh contained the following:
gdb -batch-silent \
-ex 'set logging overwri
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 03:38:22PM +, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> With 2.6.29rc5 and xorg-server 2:1.4.1~git20080131-1ubuntu9.2 switching
> to a VT after starting compiz causes X to nearly lock up.
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> 1. Start X
> 2. Run compiz
> 3. Switch to VT
The Z-buffer on integrated cards often becomes confused which leads to
surfaces that should be hidden appearing (and obstructing other surfaces).
This problem seems to have been around since at least Mesa 6.4.2 and is
still here in Mesa 7.0.3. A screenshot showing the problem can be found on
https:
Hello,
As the subject mentions I seem to get a kernel lockup when starting a
second X on a Matrox G200 card under Fedora Core 5. I have filed bugs
with logs here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193854
and here:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7173
In the RH
19 matches
Mail list logo
