Re: OT: fglrx & linux 2.6.16.1

2006-01-26 Thread satyr_22901
This is somewhat off-topic but I figured I'd mention it anyway... > Boris Peterbarg wrote: > > fglrx halts even with glxinfo here for some reason (linux 2.6.15.1, > xorg > > 2.6.9) > > I've attached the dump with USE_ARB_F_P == 1. > Oops, should've been xorg 6.9.0 > I discovered the same proble

Re: r300 DRI killing X

2005-08-05 Thread satyr_22901
Small update that might help... taking the setup that works, unloading the drm and radeon modules, loading the newer drm and radeon modules (the versions reported by the radeon are 1.15.0 and 1.16.0, respectively), then restarting X causes the same error message about a corrupted page table. My gu

r300 DRI killing X

2005-08-03 Thread satyr_22901
I've been following the r300 driver development though I've not done much with it lately, but while trying the latest version that was merged into the DRI CVS tree I'm unable to successfully start X. First, the system: it's an Athlon 64 laptop with a 128MB Mobilitiy Radeon 9700 and 2 GB of RAM, r

Re: [R300] Radeon 9550 Problems

2005-03-02 Thread satyr_22901
Thank you for the advice. The problem I had before with the DRM modules (drm.ko and radeon.ko) from the r300 CVS was that drm.ko would load fine but loading radeon.ko was causing my computer to lock up after a kernel panic. I had tried it rebuilding both it and the kernel several times without su

[R300] Radeon 9550 Problems

2005-03-01 Thread satyr_22901
Hi, I'm new to DRI development but am interested in helping with the r300 driver. I am trying to get the driver working with my Radeon 9550 and I have glxinfo reporting that direct rendering is enabled and the OpenGL renderer string is "Mesa DRI R300 20040924 AGP 4x x86/MMX+/3DNow!+/SSE NO-TCL",