Hello,
Can you please test the following patch on top of the current
mainline? Thanks.
diff --git a/lib/idr.c b/lib/idr.c
index 1cac726..0dc7822 100644
--- a/lib/idr.c
+++ b/lib/idr.c
@@ -156,10 +156,12 @@ static int sub_alloc(struct idr *idp, int *starting_id,
struct idr_layer **pa)
On 02/04/2010 10:28 AM, Andy Isaacson wrote:
On my Dell Latitude e4300 commit 859ddf0974 (idr: fix a critical
misallocation bug) causes Xorg to segfault with the following
backtrace:
Does the following patch make any difference?
diff --git a/lib/idr.c b/lib/idr.c
index ba7d37c..a96c604 100644
Hello,
On 02/04/2010 04:56 PM, Andy Isaacson wrote:
1265267921.568269 ioctl(8, 0xc020645e, 0x7fffe2196980) = -1 EBADF (Bad file
descriptor)
Hmm... -EBADF? I suppose it doesn't mean that the fd is invalid in
this case but that the mapped object can't be found for some reason?
Can anyone more
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello,
On 02/04/2010 04:56 PM, Andy Isaacson wrote:
1265267921.568269 ioctl(8, 0xc020645e, 0x7fffe2196980) = -1 EBADF (Bad file
descriptor)
Hmm... -EBADF? I suppose it doesn't mean that the fd is invalid in
this case but
Hello,
On 02/04/2010 05:40 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
Hmm at this late stage, maybe revert first? since the old idr code works fine
with the subsystems in question.
The drm idr code usage isn't anything crazy, the EBADF is the return code
from the mmap ioctl when it calls the idr lookup
On Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:16:56 +0900, Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org wrote:
Hello,
On 02/04/2010 04:56 PM, Andy Isaacson wrote:
1265267921.568269 ioctl(8, 0xc020645e, 0x7fffe2196980) = -1 EBADF (Bad file
descriptor)
Hmm... -EBADF? I suppose it doesn't mean that the fd is invalid in
this
On my Dell Latitude e4300 commit 859ddf0974 (idr: fix a critical
misallocation bug) causes Xorg to segfault with the following
backtrace:
...
(II) intel(0): Initializing HW Cursor
(II) intel(0): No memory allocations
Backtrace:
0: /usr/bin/X11/X(xorg_backtrace+0x26) [0x4f00c6]
1:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 12:11:41PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
On 02/04/2010 10:28 AM, Andy Isaacson wrote:
On my Dell Latitude e4300 commit 859ddf0974 (idr: fix a critical
misallocation bug) causes Xorg to segfault with the following
backtrace:
Does the following patch make any difference?
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 05:28:37PM -0800, Andy Isaacson wrote:
On my Dell Latitude e4300 commit 859ddf0974 (idr: fix a critical
misallocation bug) causes Xorg to segfault with the following
backtrace:
...
(II) intel(0): Initializing HW Cursor
(II) intel(0): No memory allocations
