--- Felix Kühling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 20:14:43 -0400
Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 16:18, Patrick McFarland wrote:
[snip]
That shouldn't matter, should it? The userland stuff should never
lock
the machine up.
I'll test it
Most IMPORTANT is that some-one some-where there is a list of ALL of
these. These are best in the form of code comments so the the respective
places in the code can be changed.
--- Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dose the DRM varify that the cmds are in this order? Why not just
have
On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 14:12:08 -0400, Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can test the r200_dri.so from the snapshot with the DRM from the
kernel...
And drum roll please...
The dri cvs snapshot works fine on both it's own kernel module, and
the one that comes
with 2.6.8.1. So now what?
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 05:07:45 -0400, Patrick McFarland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lots of badly formatted text.
I do apologize for anyone who had to read that.
--
Patrick Diablo-D3 McFarland || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd
all be
Mike Mestnik wrote:
Most IMPORTANT is that some-one some-where there is a list of ALL of
these. These are best in the form of code comments so the the respective
places in the code can be changed.
--- Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dose the DRM varify that the cmds are in this order? Why
On Maw, 2004-09-07 at 10:07, Patrick McFarland wrote:
Also, what happens to r200 users who happen to use Debian? Using dri
cvs snapshots
If Debian is currently shipping a buggy driver then Debian needs to ship
a working driver. Same as anyone else. You'll also need the newest
dri driver for
Sorry, I don't know why we are cross posting and including subscribers in
CC. This belongs on the DRI list, as it is only with 3rd party DRI-client
code that the problem exists.
--- Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 09:07:11 +0200, Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 20:14:43 -0400
Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 16:18, Patrick McFarland wrote:
[snip]
That shouldn't matter, should it? The userland stuff should never lock
the machine up.
I'll test it anyhow, though.
No, it shouldn't. Anything that
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 20:14:43 -0400, Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How to fix this is a pretty hot topic now.
Yow, I didn't mean to cause such an upset. ;)
Currently, the dri cvs snapshot for 20040905 doesn't compile with
2.6.8.1 for me (I've sent
a bug report to the dri-devel mailing list
On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 07:01 -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 20:14:43 -0400, Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How to fix this is a pretty hot topic now.
Yow, I didn't mean to cause such an upset. ;)
Currently, the dri cvs snapshot for 20040905 doesn't compile with
On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 16:36 -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 14:14:55 -0400, Michel Dnzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What version of the DRI driver?
Where do I look for that?
Where did you get r200_dri.so from?
--
Earthling Michel Dnzer | Debian (powerpc), X and
On Sat, 4 Sep 2004 11:59:12 +0100 (IST), Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you insmod the radeon drm module with drm_opts=debug do the test and
send on the trace, it may be getting wedged somewhere unexpected...
Here you go, but it doesn't look like it has output anything interesting.
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 13:40:54 -0400, Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 04:22 -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 02:34:59 -0400, Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where did you get r200_dri.so from?
From the one that comes with the Deb X
On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 16:18 -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 13:40:54 -0400, Michel Dnzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 04:22 -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 02:34:59 -0400, Michel Dnzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where did you
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 16:25:00 -0400, Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 16:18 -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
That shouldn't matter, should it? The userland stuff should never lock
the machine up.
In an ideal world... Feel free to track down the cause and add code
On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 16:18, Patrick McFarland wrote:
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 13:40:54 -0400, Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 04:22 -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 02:34:59 -0400, Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where did you get
I'm currently using an r200 (specifically, an agp 'ATI Technologies
Inc Radeon R200 QM [Radeon 9100]') on a uniproc Pentium 3 board
equipped with an intel 440bx/piix4 type chipset (the agp controller is
identified as 'Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX AGP bridge (rev
03)'
All of this was
Can you insmod the radeon drm module with drm_opts=debug do the test and
send on the trace, it may be getting wedged somewhere unexpected...
Dave.
All of this was tested with a virgin 2.6.8.1 (with debug info and
frame pointers enabled) and Debian's XFree86 4.3.0.1, using DarkPlaces
and
On Sat, 2004-09-04 at 05:16 -0400, Patrick McFarland wrote:
All of this was tested with a virgin 2.6.8.1 (with debug info and
frame pointers enabled) and Debian's XFree86 4.3.0.1, [...]
What version of the DRI driver?
--
Earthling Michel Dnzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI
On Sat, 04 Sep 2004 14:14:55 -0400, Michel Dänzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What version of the DRI driver?
Where do I look for that?
--
Patrick Diablo-D3 McFarland || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd
all be running around in
20 matches
Mail list logo
