[Bug 12108] New device id for VIA P4M900

2008-01-03 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 12108] New device id for VIA P4M900

2007-08-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #11219|6.8-branch? | Flag|

[Bug 12108] New device id for VIA P4M900

2007-08-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12108 --- Comment #3 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 15:08 PST --- I'm not sure either. I though setting the flag to '?' might be used to show a patch that needs to be reviewed, and '+' and '-' to respectively ACK or NACK it. At least that

[Bug 12108] New device id for VIA P4M900

2007-08-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12108 --- Comment #2 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-29 11:39 PST --- I'm not sure why you think setting 6.8-branch is a useful thing to do. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receivin

[Bug 12108] New device id for VIA P4M900

2007-08-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #11219||6.8-branch? Flag|

[Bug 12108] New device id for VIA P4M900

2007-08-23 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12108 --- Comment #1 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-23 03:21 PST --- Created an attachment (id=11219) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=11219&action=view) P4M900 pci id patch -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop