http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
Resolution|PATCH_ALREA
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
--- Comment #11 from Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-07-26 22:43:55 ---
On Monday 20 July 2009, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 21:11:30 +0100
> Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 12:06:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 21:11:30 +0100
Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 12:06:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
> > Subject : i915 VT switch with AIGLX causes X lock up
> > Submitter : Sitsofe Whe
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 12:06:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
> Subject : i915 VT switch with AIGLX causes X lock up
> Submitter : Sitsofe Wheeler
> Date : 2009-02-21 15:38 (107 days old)
> First-
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
--- Comment #10 from Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-06-01 20:09:53 ---
On Sunday 31 May 2009, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 09:55:33PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a
On Sunday 31 May 2009, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 09:55:33PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 09:55:33PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 09:31:15PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.
On Wednesday 27 May 2009, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 09:31:15PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current l
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
--- Comment #9 from Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-05-26 23:12:06 ---
On Wednesday 27 May 2009, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 09:31:15PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
Sitsofe Wheeler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sits...@yahoo.com
--- Comment #8 fro
On Monday 18 May 2009, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 10:05:57PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (eithe
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
--- Comment #7 from Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-05-18 17:11:26 ---
On Monday 18 May 2009, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 10:05:57PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regres
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 10:05:57PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
--- Comment #6 from Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-04-28 21:45:44 ---
Handled-By : Jesse Barnes
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/20197/
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
--- Comment #5 from Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-04-28 21:43:19 ---
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/27/317
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You a
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:46:51AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:46:26 +0200 (CEST)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
> >
> > The following bug entr
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:46:26 +0200 (CEST)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.28 an
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
--- Comment #4 from Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-04-26 11:10:29 ---
Notify-Also : DRI
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are watching the assignee of t
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
--- Comment #3 from r...@sisk.pl 2009-03-19 06:03 ---
On Monday 16 March 2009, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 08:05:32PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
--- Comment #2 from r...@sisk.pl 2009-03-14 11:39 ---
Caused by:
commit 14d200c5e5bd19219d930bbb9a5a22758c8f5bec
Author: Jesse Barnes
Date: Fri Feb 6 13:04:49 2009 -0800
drm/i915: capture last_vblank count at IRQ uninstall time
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12765
--- Comment #1 from r...@sisk.pl 2009-02-26 14:32 ---
On Thursday 26 February 2009, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:48:18PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part
28 matches
Mail list logo
