[Bug #12836] 2.6.29-rc breaks STD using Intel 945

2009-04-26 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know (either way

[Bug 12836] 2.6.29-rc breaks STD using Intel 945

2009-04-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12836 Rafael J. Wysocki changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 12836] 2.6.29-rc breaks STD using Intel 945

2009-04-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12836 Rafael J. Wysocki changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug 12836] 2.6.29-rc breaks STD using Intel 945

2009-04-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12836 Rolf Eike Beer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eike-ker...@sf-tec.de --- Comment #3

[Bug 12836] 2.6.29-rc breaks STD using Intel 945

2009-04-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12836 --- Comment #2 from Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-04-26 11:13:14 --- Notify-Also : DRI -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are watching the assignee of t

[Bug 12836] 2.6.29-rc breaks STD using Intel 945

2009-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12836 --- Comment #1 from Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-04-05 10:54:22 --- On Monday 16 March 2009, Frank Seidel wrote: > Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: > > Hmm. Does switching to and then back from a virtual terminal also break? > > I think i have the same probl