https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|CLOSED
Resolution|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #35 from Alex Deucher 2010-03-15 18:03:22
---
This bug can probably be closed.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are watching the as
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #34 from Alex Deucher 2010-03-15 18:01:40
---
(In reply to comment #33)
> I've updated kernel and xf86-video-ati and Vimeo works great for me!
>
> Can this be related to
> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-ati/co
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #33 from Rafał Miłecki 2010-03-15 17:59:36 ---
I've updated kernel and xf86-video-ati and Vimeo works great for me!
Can this be related to
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-ati/commit/?id=488c9fd8300505cc6c0c2f8f0
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #32 from Anonymous Emailer
2010-02-28 19:50:01 ---
Reply-To: andy...@ukfsn.org
bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> --- Comment #30 from Rafał Miłecki 2010-02-28 19:01:21 ---
>
> That's weird because we don't have prob
bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> --- Comment #30 from Rafał Miłecki 2010-02-28 19:01:21 ---
>
> That's weird because we don't have problems with YouTube. It's about Vimeo.
Most youtube works for me, but some larger ones don't. I also see the
effect of working/not working depending
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #31 from Pauli 2010-02-28 19:41:26 ---
Why NOTOURBUG?
Because Linux flash player is buggy. It is trying to do something that is never
going to have good performance. Uploading data to VRAM and reading it back late
is always going
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #30 from Rafał Miłecki 2010-02-28 19:01:21 ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> Reply-To: andy...@ukfsn.org
>
> Andy Furniss wrote:
> > Andy Furniss wrote:
> >
> >> Out of curiosity, why does it work OK with UMS?
> >
> > To possibly an
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #29 from Michał Witkowski 2010-02-28 16:24:11 ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> I vote for NOTOURBUG too.
>
> Maybe ddx could be a bit better optimized for XGetSubImage that flash is using
> but in end we can't get it perform well
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #28 from Anonymous Emailer
2010-02-28 15:57:51 ---
Reply-To: andy...@ukfsn.org
Andy Furniss wrote:
> Andy Furniss wrote:
>
>> Out of curiosity, why does it work OK with UMS?
>
> To possibly answer my own question for my case - AG
Andy Furniss wrote:
> Andy Furniss wrote:
>
>> Out of curiosity, why does it work OK with UMS?
>
> To possibly answer my own question for my case - AGP cards have accel
> UTS/DFS disabled in UMS.
This does seem to be the case, if I enable uts/dfs in UMS (with
BusTypePCIE) I run out of CPU while p
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #27 from Anonymous Emailer
2010-02-28 13:59:04 ---
Reply-To: andy...@ukfsn.org
bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #25 from Pauli 2010-02-27 06:3
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #26 from Anonymous Emailer
2010-02-28 12:52:24 ---
Reply-To: andy...@ukfsn.org
Andy Furniss wrote:
> Out of curiosity, why does it work OK with UMS?
To possibly answer my own question for my case - AGP cards have accel
UTS/DFS
Andy Furniss wrote:
> Out of curiosity, why does it work OK with UMS?
To possibly answer my own question for my case - AGP cards have accel
UTS/DFS disabled in UMS.
--
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new so
bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #25 from Pauli 2010-02-27 06:39:33 ---
> I vote for NOTOURBUG too.
>
> Maybe ddx could be a bit better optimized for XGetSubImage that flash is using
> but in end we can't get it
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #25 from Pauli 2010-02-27 06:39:33 ---
I vote for NOTOURBUG too.
Maybe ddx could be a bit better optimized for XGetSubImage that flash is using
but in end we can't get it perform well enough anyway without modifying the
blob.
So
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #24 from Michel Dänzer 2010-02-24 10:30:20 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> If anything that has been leaked about flash video playback is true
> then flash is using DFS to get video frmes for postprocessing (adding
> UI elements).
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #23 from Vi0L0 2010-02-23 20:28:48 ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Similar issues appear _without_ flash video in Firefox:
>
> http://www.afiestas.org/fulfilling-promises-apple-wireless-keyboard-working-with-kbluetooth/
>
> Every
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #22 from Michał Witkowski 2010-02-23 18:41:35 ---
Similar issues appear _without_ flash video in Firefox:
http://www.afiestas.org/fulfilling-promises-apple-wireless-keyboard-working-with-kbluetooth/
Everything appears really real
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #21 from Michał Witkowski 2010-02-22 22:19:19 ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> With midori browser flash seems to work much faster.
> In fact i've got no lags on our vimeo flash video example when using midori...
> So maybe it's not
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #20 from Vi0L0 2010-02-22 21:45:55 ---
With midori browser flash seems to work much faster.
In fact i've got no lags on our vimeo flash video example when using midori...
So maybe it's not kms problem at all(?)
--
Configure bugma
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #19 from Rafał Miłecki 2010-02-21 22:32:42 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> The radeon driver does vline range waits to prevent tearing when doing buffer
> swaps. That is likely the case if flash uses GL. You can remove the vline
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #18 from Rafael J. Wysocki 2010-02-21 22:06:23 ---
On Sunday 21 February 2010, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> 2010/2/21 Rafael J. Wysocki :
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
> > Subject : Flash
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression|Yes |No
--- Comment #17 from Rafael J.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #16 from Luca Tettamanti 2010-02-17 17:11:15
---
(In reply to comment #15)
> If anything that has been leaked about flash video playback is true
> then flash is using DFS to get video frmes for postprocessing (adding
> UI elements
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #15 from Pauli 2010-02-17 16:56:52 ---
If anything that has been leaked about flash video playback is true
then flash is using DFS to get video frmes for postprocessing (adding
UI elements).
We should prevent the first copy to vram
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
Luca Tettamanti changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kronos...@gmail.com
--- Comment #14
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #13 from Michel Dänzer 2010-02-17 15:59:54 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
I'm not sure why any DownloadFromScreen operations would be necessary in the
fast path for playing a video... Might be better to find and fix the cause of
tha
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alexdeuc...@gmail.com
--- Comment #12 f
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
Pauli changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||suok...@gmail.com
--- Comment #11 from Pauli
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #10 from Vi0L0 2010-02-17 12:45:00 ---
xorg-server 1.7.4.901 here.
Also site with many flash elements (like some myspace profiles) are much more
laggy with kms than with ums.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userp
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #9 from Rafał Miłecki 2010-02-17 09:42:45 ---
Whoops, ldish 1.6.5 here. Thanks for pointing, will try updating when I'll
find some free day :)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- Y
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
Jérôme Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
CC|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #7 from Rafał Miłecki 2010-02-16 20:57:11 ---
Michał: did radeon KMS in 2.6.32 work any better for you (I mean this flash
issue ofc)?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiv
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
Rafael J. Wysocki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r...@sisk.pl
Blocks|
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #6 from Michał Witkowski 2010-02-13 18:06:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=25033)
--> (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=25033)
Sysprof trace of first 2 minutes of the video (gzipped)
Trace environment:
Running KMS rad
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #5 from Pauli 2010-02-13 17:27:05 ---
> --- Comment #4 from Michał Witkowski 2010-02-13 17:16:37 ---
> Nope, I'm not using dynpm.
>
> At first I also thought it's a flash issue. Later however, I've watched the
> same video with u
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #4 from Michał Witkowski 2010-02-13 17:16:37 ---
Nope, I'm not using dynpm.
At first I also thought it's a flash issue. Later however, I've watched the
same video with using the Intel card and it didn't skip or lag. That made my
i
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
--- Comment #3 from Vi0L0 2010-02-13 17:07:24 ---
Tested also on:
Kernel: 2.6.33-rc8 vanilla
Browsers: Opera 10.10, Arora 0.10.2
dynpm=1 is braking my kms...
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- Y
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
Rafał Miłecki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zaj...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from R
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15293
Vi0L0 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vi0l...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Vi0L0
41 matches
Mail list logo
