https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #29 from Artem S. Tashkinov t.ar...@mailcity.com 2010-07-23
09:09:32 ---
Somehow someone has forgotten to push this patch into the mainline.
OK, let's wait until 2.6.36 comes out :(
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #27 from Artem S. Tashkinov t.ar...@mailcity.com 2010-07-13
08:33:21 ---
Jesse, your patch hasn't be included into the mainline 2.6.35-rc5, I hope it
will be included before 2.6.35 gets released.
And like you asked I've sent my
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #28 from Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org 2010-07-13
15:52:14 ---
Jesse, your patch hasn't be included into the mainline 2.6.35-rc5, I hope it
will be included before 2.6.35 gets released.
And like you asked I've sent
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #26 from Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org 2010-07-09
07:18:50 ---
Our newer chips run at higher resolution, so we need more space for the
compressed framebuffer.
bugzilla-dae...@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #23 from Artem S. Tashkinov t.ar...@mailcity.com 2010-07-08
09:35:59 ---
(In reply to comment #22)
Just sent out a new version of the stolen space trim patch. Can you reply
with
your tested-by so we can get it upstream? If
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #24 from Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org 2010-07-08
15:58:55 ---
I cc'd you on the patch, subject [PATCH] drm/agp/i915: trim stolen space to
32M. It also got sent to the intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org mailing list.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #25 from Artem S. Tashkinov t.ar...@mailcity.com 2010-07-09
05:26:52 ---
I decided not to add this paragraph to my e-mail, so I'm expressing myself
here:
---
It seems like the only difference from the older patch is 32 vs 16,
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #22 from Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org 2010-07-07
21:41:58 ---
Just sent out a new version of the stolen space trim patch. Can you reply with
your tested-by so we can get it upstream? If you want it in older kernels as
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #20 from Artem S. Tashkinov t.ar...@mailcity.com 2010-07-05
20:43:52 ---
Chris, I would be very glad and grateful if I could use upcoming 2.6.35 without
patches, after all the bug has now been known for *four* months.
--
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #21 from Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk 2010-07-05
21:01:27 ---
The don't crash patch is upstream. That is all we can expect for 2.6.35, as we
don't have a method yet for returning the range reserved by the BIOS to the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #19 from Artem S. Tashkinov t.ar...@mailcity.com 2010-06-26
22:29:19 ---
2.6.35-rc3, i915 doesn't work (it loads but it doesn't allow me to run X
server, so now I'm running vesa), at least the kernel doesn't panic any longer:
[
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #15 from Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk 2010-05-17
08:29:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=26408)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26408)
Fail to load KMS without GEM.
The other half of this is to prevent
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #17 from Artem S. Tashkinov t.ar...@mailcity.com 2010-05-17
16:13:46 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
Created an attachment (id=26408)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26408) [details]
Fail to load KMS without
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #14 from Artem S. Tashkinov t.ar...@mailcity.com 2010-05-10
10:06:22 ---
Funnily 64 bit kernel sees even less RAM:
$ free
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem: 3724300 401916
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #11 from Artem S. Tashkinov t.ar...@mailcity.com 2010-05-09
07:54:53 ---
Created an attachment (id=26294)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26294)
dmesg with the patch applied
Thank you, the patch seems to work,
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #12 from Artem S. Tashkinov t.ar...@mailcity.com 2010-05-09
08:49:43 ---
I've got a little question: with or without this patch approximately 384MB of
the system RAM is missing, can anyone shed light where this fat piece of RAM
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #13 from Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org 2010-05-09
21:34:01 ---
My patch is only a partial fix; it won't actually reclaim the stolen space
allocated by the BIOS, so it will appear to be missing.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
Artem S. Tashkinov t.ar...@mailcity.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #9 from Artem S. Tashkinov t.ar...@mailcity.com 2010-05-08
13:40:16 ---
OK, the *default* BIOS settings for H55/H57 chipset on all ASRock motherboards
(and probably other vendors too) are:
Share memory: Auto
DVMT/FIXED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #10 from Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org 2010-05-08
21:03:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=26287)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26287)
trim stolen space if needed
I was hoping this patch wouldn't be
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #4 from Artem S. Tashkinov t.ar...@mailcity.com 2010-05-05
19:18:57 ---
It's kind of stupid to report (no i915 patches have been merged after rc5), but
kernel 2.6.34-rc6 is also affected.
I can post the entire backtrace in a
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch 2010-05-05 19:47:37 ---
--- Comment #4 from Artem S. Tashkinov t.ar...@mailcity.com 2010-05-05
19:18:57 ---
It's kind of stupid to report (no i915 patches have been merged after rc5),
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
Artem S. Tashkinov t.ar...@mailcity.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25406|0 |1
is
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
Artem S. Tashkinov t.ar...@mailcity.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15469
Artem S. Tashkinov t.ar...@mailcity.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Kernel Version|2.6.33 |2.6.34
28 matches
Mail list logo
