Re: [Dri-devel] Compiling i810_dma.c with gcc 3.2

2002-11-27 Thread Alan Cox
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 12:46, José Fonseca wrote: > I confess that I'm never sure how the modules in the linux kernel tree and > xfree/dri cvs compare. For a long time 4.2 modules weren't found in the > linux tree. Since which version were they included? 2.4.1something-ac and 2.4.20-rc now has the

Re: [Dri-devel] Compiling i810_dma.c with gcc 3.2

2002-11-27 Thread José Fonseca
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 12:32:46PM +, Alan Cox wrote: > On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 11:25, José Fonseca wrote: > > But if I undertsood correctly, you refering to the modules included in > > the kernel source (linux-2.4.19-gentoo-r9 in this case). I don't know > > about these, but as long as you're us

Re: [Dri-devel] Compiling i810_dma.c with gcc 3.2

2002-11-27 Thread Alan Cox
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 11:25, José Fonseca wrote: > But if I undertsood correctly, you refering to the modules included in > the kernel source (linux-2.4.19-gentoo-r9 in this case). I don't know > about these, but as long as you're using >= XFree86 4.2.0 you should > compile the ones in http://www.x

Re: [Dri-devel] Compiling i810_dma.c with gcc 3.2

2002-11-27 Thread José Fonseca
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 07:51:26PM -0500, Roland Glenn McIntosh wrote: > Gentlemen: I'm having considerable difficulty with my current kernel compile. > gcc exists with code 1 every time on i810_dma.c. > > I was hoping someone could check and make sure that this is compatible with gcc 3.2. > If

[Dri-devel] Compiling i810_dma.c with gcc 3.2

2002-11-26 Thread Roland Glenn McIntosh
Gentlemen: I'm having considerable difficulty with my current kernel compile. gcc exists with code 1 every time on i810_dma.c. I was hoping someone could check and make sure that this is compatible with gcc 3.2. If this isn't the appropriate place for something like this, please direct me to th