RE: [Dri-devel] Confusing..?

2003-02-06 Thread Alexander Stohr
I would just add that if you're using a kernel that uses a better source directory naming scheme (e.g. 2.4.19 unpacks to linux-2.4.19 whereas 2.4.18 unpacks to just linux), you'll want to use the TREE=/usr/src/linux-2.4.XX/include option in your make command. Like so: make -f

[Dri-devel] Confusing..?

2003-02-05 Thread John S. Chalice
I just last night downloaded the newest CVS from dri.sourceforge.net.. and tried compiling it.. it went smoothly.. no errors.. *BUT*.. none of the kernel modules were created.. for *any* of the video drivers listed in the host.def file.. Any ideas? -- John S. Chalice

Re: [Dri-devel] Confusing..?

2003-02-05 Thread Stefan Lange
John S. Chalice wrote: I just last night downloaded the newest CVS from dri.sourceforge.net.. and tried compiling it.. it went smoothly.. no errors.. *BUT*.. none of the kernel modules were created.. for *any* of the video drivers listed in the host.def file.. Any ideas? well, you can

Re: [Dri-devel] Confusing..?

2003-02-05 Thread ahaning
cd programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/linux/drm/kernel/ make -f Makefile.linux MODULE.o I would just add that if you're using a kernel that uses a better source directory naming scheme (e.g. 2.4.19 unpacks to linux-2.4.19 whereas 2.4.18 unpacks to just linux), you'll want to use the