On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Michel Dänzer wrote:
Absolutely, otherwise it's a bug. FWIW, the DRM from DRI CVS seems to
work the same here as the one from the linuxppc-2.5 tree shortly before
the -test5 merge. The only recent change I see which might cause
problems is my Radeon AGP = GART cleanup; I
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 17:43, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Michel Dänzer wrote:
Absolutely, otherwise it's a bug. FWIW, the DRM from DRI CVS seems to
work the same here as the one from the linuxppc-2.5 tree shortly before
the -test5 merge. The only recent change I see which
Jon Smirl wrote:
I think I have tracked this down to the DRM drivers in the kernel not matching
the ones in DRI CVS. Some of the structures in the initialization IOCTL have
changed which caused one of the ring pointers to initialize to zero instead of
what it needed. The minor version number
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Jon Smirl wrote:
I think I have tracked this down to the DRM drivers in the kernel not matching
the ones in DRI CVS. Some of the structures in the initialization IOCTL have
changed which caused one of the ring pointers to initialize to zero instead of
what it needed.
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I can do a new merge [ ... ]
Is the dri.freedesktop.org tree up-to-date? Nothing has happened on it
lately, and I wonder if people are still using the old one for
development?
Linus
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 13:12, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I can do a new merge [ ... ]
Is the dri.freedesktop.org tree up-to-date? Nothing has happened on it
lately, and I wonder if people are still using the old one for
development?
It isn't up to
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 22:11, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Jon Smirl wrote:
I think I have tracked this down to the DRM drivers in the kernel not matching
the ones in DRI CVS. Some of the structures in the initialization IOCTL have
changed which caused one of the ring
On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 01:17, Jon Smirl wrote:
In this case I loaded the radeon kernel driver from CVS. I am running XFree
from RH9. No code from embedded is involved. This is with i875P AGP.
I first started X and it ran without problem.
I stopped it and started it again.
I get an oops in
--- Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:33:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] Fault in radeon DRM module
To: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I haven't located the exact cause of this yet. Version skew is still my top
suspect
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 23:30, Jon Smirl wrote:
This line in radeon_cp is causing the problem with the ring pointers.
dev_priv-agp_vm_start = RADEON_READ( RADEON_CONFIG_APER_SIZE );
agp_vm_start is coming out zero and I don't think it should be.
Indeed, as the name suggests, it's
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Jon Smirl wrote:
I'm getting this with standalone Mesa not DRI. Can a someone more familar with
the R200 kernel DRM driver give me a clue as to what is not being set up
correctly? I die in RADEON_PURGE_CACHE() in radeon_do_cp_start().
More precisely:
Unable to handle
I'm getting this with standalone Mesa not DRI. Can a someone more familar with
the R200 kernel DRM driver give me a clue as to what is not being set up
correctly? I die in RADEON_PURGE_CACHE() in radeon_do_cp_start().
There also looks to be a bug. After the fault there is a radeon_vm_shm_close.
12 matches
Mail list logo
