Re: [Dri-devel] Last part of GLX_SGI_make_current_read support

2003-06-26 Thread Brian Paul
Ian Romanick wrote: Brian Paul wrote: Ian Romanick wrote: I'm rounding out the final bits of support for SGI_make_current_read. I've hit a (hopefully) minor snag, and I'd like some advice on how to proceede. At this point, *all* of the client-side support, both in libGL.so and in at least

Re: [Dri-devel] Last part of GLX_SGI_make_current_read support

2003-06-26 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 23:42, Ian Romanick wrote: Just by looking at how things are called, making these changes would seem to be a binary compatability problem. Is that assessment correct? It seems like I can, with a certain amount of pain and suffering, work around the problem *if* I

[Dri-devel] Last part of GLX_SGI_make_current_read support

2003-06-24 Thread Ian Romanick
I'm rounding out the final bits of support for SGI_make_current_read. I've hit a (hopefully) minor snag, and I'd like some advice on how to proceede. At this point, *all* of the client-side support, both in libGL.so and in at least one driver, is in place. I'm now working on the server-side

Re: [Dri-devel] Last part of GLX_SGI_make_current_read support

2003-06-24 Thread Brian Paul
Ian Romanick wrote: I'm rounding out the final bits of support for SGI_make_current_read. I've hit a (hopefully) minor snag, and I'd like some advice on how to proceede. At this point, *all* of the client-side support, both in libGL.so and in at least one driver, is in place. I'm now working