Jon Smirl wrote:
I don't think they are necessary so the _SOLO defines could be extended. Keith
wrote the code so I'm not sure what he intentions were.
--- Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current miniglx fakes up some DDX version numbers but these only work
for the radeon drivers, (4.0)
Hi!
Yep, I had the same problems, trying to get the
TDFX/solo work.
Keith?
I don't think they are necessary so the _SOLO defines
could be extended. Keith wrote the code so I'm not
sure what he intentions were.
--- Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current miniglx fakes up some DDX
I don't think they are necessary so the _SOLO defines could be extended. Keith
wrote the code so I'm not sure what he intentions were.
--- Dave Airlie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current miniglx fakes up some DDX version numbers but these only work
for the radeon drivers, (4.0) is used, but
