On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 04:08:06 +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Alan Hourihane wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:37:34 +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >
> >>XFree86 BOD wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>It has been brought to the attention of the XFree86 Core Team that one
> >>>of its members, Keith Packard,
Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps then, this will provide enough incentive for DRI to move back into
> a pure extension module form, rather than its current xfree tree
> entanglement.
You don't want to imply that people touch bigger areas as is would be
necessary for DRI developme
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 04:08:06PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> From my selfish point of view, an XFree fork will put the DRI tree in a bit
> of a difficult position - especially if the new fork gets significant distro
> support and we have to somehow track both trees or go through yet anoth
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:37:34 +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> XFree86 BOD wrote:
>
> >It has been brought to the attention of the XFree86 Core Team that one
> >of its members, Keith Packard, has been actively (but privately) seeking
> >out support for a fork of XFree86 that would be led by himse
