[Dri-devel] Re: [Announcement] config-0-0-1-branch needs testers

2003-10-01 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 12:22, Felix Kühling wrote: > > I suggest to wait a few more days for more reactions to my announcement. > In the mean time I'm going to update the snapshot scripts to include > xdriinfo. If noone objects I could do the merge on the weekend. Sounds good. > P.S.: Were you

[Dri-devel] Re: [Announcement] config-0-0-1-branch needs testers

2003-10-01 Thread Felix Kühling
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 12:12:25 +0200 Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 23:07, Felix Kühling wrote: > > > > However, before we feel confident enough to merge the branch we need > > more feedback. So please test it, your feedback is very welcome. > > Why not merge it t

[Dri-devel] Re: [Announcement] config-0-0-1-branch needs testers

2003-10-01 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 23:07, Felix Kühling wrote: > > However, before we feel confident enough to merge the branch we need > more feedback. So please test it, your feedback is very welcome. Why not merge it to the trunk now, are you waiting for another big merge to intervene? ;) It seems unlikely

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Announcement

2001-06-07 Thread Gareth Hughes
Digital Z-Man wrote: > > > There is a project on sourceforge to create a new X server from > > scratch. "linuxgfx" > > > > While it is a cool idea, it will take 10 years to complete. > > XFree86 wont be sitting idle for that time. It is easy to say > > "scrap XFree86", and I agree that it is a

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Announcement

2001-06-06 Thread Digital Z-Man
"Mike A. Harris" wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Digital Z-Man wrote: > > > Well, you haven't looked very hard my friend. ;o) > > The design document is included in the XFree86 source code, and > always has been. > > xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/doc/DESIGN > > In fairness to you though, it isn'

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Announcement

2001-06-06 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Andreas Ehliar wrote: >> Perhaps, but it is a very very very minimal NDA. Definitely not >> an evil NDA, or many people myself included wouldn't agree to it. > >Certainly, but you have to be "inside" to have any chance of >getting this NDA. That is my impression at least. If

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Announcement

2001-06-05 Thread Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Digital Z-Man <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "Mike A. Harris" wrote: > > > > > >c) There are limited projects - cards are usually not supported because of > > >an nVidia-like situation or have a well known "guru" doing the coding. No > > >nice easy intros to coding drivers. > > > > The DESIGN doc

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Announcement

2001-06-05 Thread Digital Z-Man
"Mike A. Harris" wrote: > > >c) There are limited projects - cards are usually not supported because of > >an nVidia-like situation or have a well known "guru" doing the coding. No > >nice easy intros to coding drivers. > > The DESIGN document is pretty much a good start. If one can get it. I

[Dri-devel] Re: Announcement

2001-06-05 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Will Newton wrote: >> In theory, yes. In practice? Not really. Sure, the odd patch is >> submitted, but that's about it. Not much else has come from the "open >> source community"... > >Probably because: > >a) XFree86 is a big horrible beast (esp. if you're using a dial-up