Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Another question on Fedora GL

2003-11-19 Thread Lionel Ulmer
Either that or apps can work around buggy libGLs by checking the client extension string for GLX_ARB_get_proc_address. That extension is client-side only, so that's good enough. Well, this is the output of a glxinfo from an user with the bug : name of display: :0.0 display: :0 screen: 0

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Another question on Fedora GL

2003-11-19 Thread Ian Romanick
Lionel Ulmer wrote: Either that or apps can work around buggy libGLs by checking the client extension string for GLX_ARB_get_proc_address. That extension is client-side only, so that's good enough. Well, this is the output of a glxinfo from an user with the bug : [snip] And you can see that

[Dri-devel] Re: Another question on Fedora GL

2003-11-14 Thread Alex Deucher
I'd point you to the patches if I could remember when this last came up. If someone has time they might look through the dri-devel or dri-users archives. Does anyone on dri-devel remember this issue and what the fix was? glXGetProcAddressARB not being available. Alex --- Mike A. Harris [EMAIL

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Another question on Fedora GL

2003-11-14 Thread Lionel Ulmer
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 01:11:24PM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote: I'd point you to the patches if I could remember when this last came up. If someone has time they might look through the dri-devel or dri-users archives. Does anyone on dri-devel remember this issue and what the fix was?

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Another question on Fedora GL

2003-11-14 Thread Ian Romanick
Lionel Ulmer wrote: On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 01:11:24PM -0800, Alex Deucher wrote: I'd point you to the patches if I could remember when this last came up. If someone has time they might look through the dri-devel or dri-users archives. Does anyone on dri-devel remember this issue and what the