Re: [Dri-devel] Re: G400 Compatibility Test Results

2002-04-12 Thread Ian Romanick
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 04:08:44PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote: 1. dribench002.dm_67 hung on the texthrash.cfg setting. The X server could be killed, but not restarted. System had to be rebooted. In this case, the ultramax.cfg setting was not tested. I am now able to reliably reproduce

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: G400 Compatibility Test Results

2002-04-09 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 05:23:31PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote: I'm a little bit suspicious of these hangs, and I would like to see if anyone else can reproduce them. Volunteers? I just tested with quake3. The startup video doesn't work at all. I just see the brownish background (first frame

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: G400 Compatibility Test Results

2002-04-09 Thread Jens Owen
Ville Syrjälä wrote: I'm going to try to the trunk later today. Ville, If you really want to isolate whether this is related to drmCommand changes, then try the trunk from the day we split out the drmcommand branch. That should have all the bugs the drmcommand branch has with out any of the

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: G400 Compatibility Test Results

2002-04-09 Thread Panagiotis Papadakos
I have the same problem with the introduction of quake3 (it renders only the firt frame), using the latest Xfree86-CVS with Mesa-4.0.2. So this is not a bug of drm-command. Regards Panagiotis Papadakos ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: G400 Compatibility Test Results

2002-04-09 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 09:16:41AM -0600, Jens Owen wrote: Ville Syrjälä wrote: I'm going to try to the trunk later today. Ville, If you really want to isolate whether this is related to drmCommand changes, then try the trunk from the day we split out the drmcommand branch. That

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: G400 Compatibility Test Results

2002-04-09 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 08:39:10AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote: This is a known issue. It's in the texture management code. IIRC, the problem is that the whole texture isn't uploaded properly. In any case, the new texture management code that I (still) am awaiting permission to release fixes

[Dri-devel] Re: G400 Compatibility Test Results

2002-04-08 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Ian Romanick wrote: Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 16:00:05 -0700 From: Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: DRI developer's list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=J/dobhs11T7y2rNN List-Id: dri-devel.lists.sourceforge.net Subject: G400 Compatibility Test Results

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: G400 Compatibility Test Results

2002-04-08 Thread Ian Romanick
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 07:03:34PM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote: On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Ian Romanick wrote: I'm sending this as an HTML attachment. If this causes anybody problems, let me know and I can re-send as plain text. Doesn't cause any problems.. just can't read it. ;o) D'oh...I

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: G400 Compatibility Test Results

2002-04-08 Thread Jens Owen
Ian Romanick wrote: On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 07:03:34PM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote: On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Ian Romanick wrote: I'm sending this as an HTML attachment. If this causes anybody problems, let me know and I can re-send as plain text. Doesn't cause any problems.. just