On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 03:59:35PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> IMHO the best thing would be to educate users about
> /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build .
So, how about a "Please put a symbolic link to the location of your kernel
build tree under /lib/modules/"`uname -r`"/build" if that file doesn't y
Am Donnerstag, 24. Oktober 2002 15:59 schrieb Michel Dänzer:
> On Die, 2002-10-22 at 23:30, Malte Cornils wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:07:24PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > > The gotcha about TREE is that you have to provide the include
> > > directory, so you'd have to use
> > > TREE=/h
On Die, 2002-10-22 at 23:30, Malte Cornils wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:07:24PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > The gotcha about TREE is that you have to provide the include directory, so
> > you'd have to use TREE=/home/mcornils/kernel-source-2.4.18/include in this case.
>
> Errm, is t
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:07:24PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> The gotcha about TREE is that you have to provide the include directory, so
> you'd have to use TREE=/home/mcornils/kernel-source-2.4.18/include in this case.
Errm, is this documented somewhere? Couldn't this be part of the inst
On Die, 2002-10-22 at 02:43, Malte Cornils wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:08:20PM +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > >[using /usr/include/linux etc symlinks]
> > >Worked for ages.
> >
> > Well, maybe, but it has always been the wrong thing to do,
> > at least according to Linus, and th
