On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.06.05 20:34 Leif Delgass wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > In _wait_ring you don't check if card is idle (and resume) so you could
> > > be forever waiting for free space space.
> >
> > I do see the problem
On 2002.06.05 20:34 Leif Delgass wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > In _wait_ring you don't check if card is idle (and resume) so you could
> > be forever waiting for free space space.
>
> I do see the problem there, I was thinking that this couldn't be
> triggered
>
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Leif Delgass wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> >
> > > Leif,
> > >
> > > As I was restructuring part of the DMA submission code I realized that
> > > there is a fault in the NO_BATCH_DISPATCH path. You don't guarant
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> Leif,
>
> As I was restructuring part of the DMA submission code I realized that
> there is a fault in the NO_BATCH_DISPATCH path. You don't guarantee
> that the card doesn't stop at any momment because you've chosen not
> check if a change in the las
