[Dri-devel] Re: Some DRM related changes for running multiple i810/830M X servers

2003-02-16 Thread Charl P. Botha
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 01:32:09AM +, Alan Hourihane wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 04:37:31 -0500, David Dawes wrote: > > I meant to add that it'd be good if something along the lines of Michel > > Dnzer's work to allow DRI to be reinitialised at VT switch was added in > > after 4.3. I'm cu

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Some DRM related changes for running multiple i810/830M X servers

2003-02-15 Thread David Dawes
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 06:24:50PM -0500, Leif Delgass wrote: >On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, David Dawes wrote: > >[snip] > >> There are some more serious things holding up 4.3, including the issue >> that Leif mentioned here a couple of days ago. I haven't seen anyone >> comment on his proposed solution f

[Dri-devel] Re: Some DRM related changes for running multiple i810/830M X servers

2003-02-14 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 04:37:31 -0500, David Dawes wrote: > I meant to add that it'd be good if something along the lines of Michel > Dnzer's work to allow DRI to be reinitialised at VT switch was added in > after 4.3. I'm curious why it didn't made it into the DRI trunk already. Michel's is goo

[Dri-devel] Re: Some DRM related changes for running multiple i810/830M X servers

2003-02-14 Thread Alan Hourihane
Certainly can't see any immediate problem David. We can always cut a 4.3.1 if issues are found anyway. Alan. On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 04:17:16 -0500, David Dawes wrote: > Egbert and I have been looking into the issues that are preventing a second > X server to be started for i810/830M platforms w

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Some DRM related changes for running multiple i810/830M X servers

2003-02-14 Thread Alan Hourihane
This patch looks good to me Leif. Alan. On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 06:24:50 -0500, Leif Delgass wrote: > On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, David Dawes wrote: > > [snip] > > > There are some more serious things holding up 4.3, including the issue > > that Leif mentioned here a couple of days ago. I haven't see

[Dri-devel] Re: Some DRM related changes for running multiple i810/830M X servers

2003-02-14 Thread David Dawes
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 03:35:48PM -0600, D. Hageman wrote: >Since the changes touch the general DRM code I would say hold off on >making the changes. I think it might be a good idea to push the 4.3.0 out >the door and let the vendors pick up that for release since quite a few >improvements alr

[Dri-devel] Re: Some DRM related changes for running multiple i810/830M X servers

2003-02-14 Thread D. Hageman
Since the changes touch the general DRM code I would say hold off on making the changes. I think it might be a good idea to push the 4.3.0 out the door and let the vendors pick up that for release since quite a few improvements already exist in the code base. At that point we can focus on a

[Dri-devel] Re: Some DRM related changes for running multiple i810/830M X servers

2003-02-14 Thread David Dawes
I meant to add that it'd be good if something along the lines of Michel Dänzer's work to allow DRI to be reinitialised at VT switch was added in after 4.3. I'm curious why it didn't made it into the DRI trunk already. David On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 04:17:16PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: >Egbert and