Re: [Dri-devel] drm_clip_rect_t vs XF86DRIClipRectRec in i810..

2004-05-04 Thread Keith Whitwell
Dave Airlie wrote: In Keiths bunch of changes to make the drivers build in Mesa tree he changed the i810_dri .h from using drm_+clip_rect_t to XF86DRIClipRectRec, this break solo, if I change it back it'll probably break dri target... which is correct? Well, it depends... The recent patch reverte

Re: [Dri-devel] drm_clip_rect_t vs XF86DRIClipRectRec in i810..

2004-05-02 Thread Jon Smirl
I thought the long term goal for the Mesa tree is to get rid of all X based type pollution. Every time X based types start getting into the Mesa tree Mesa ends up being dependent on the X header files. Since mesa is used in other places than X we don't want this. So I would think the answer is dr

[Dri-devel] drm_clip_rect_t vs XF86DRIClipRectRec in i810..

2004-05-02 Thread Dave Airlie
In Keiths bunch of changes to make the drivers build in Mesa tree he changed the i810_dri .h from using drm_+clip_rect_t to XF86DRIClipRectRec, this break solo, if I change it back it'll probably break dri target... which is correct? Dave. -- David Airlie, Software Engineer http://www.skynet.